Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 10F <br />Staff Report No. <br />Meeting Date: June 12, 2000 <br />Type of Business: C.B. <br />WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br />Item Title/Subject: Budget Transfers <br />Date of Report: August 29, 2018 <br /> <br />Now that the Airport Litigation / Legislation and has come to a close, staff has compiled the <br />expenses including Consultants for this issue. In consultation with the Finance Director, it has <br />been determined that an additional $79,614.22 is required above the $15,000.00 budgeted in the <br />Council’s legal budget. Here is the outline of expense as identified by the invoices and the <br />Finance Director: <br /> Airport Litigation $13,263.10 <br /> 9,218.45 <br /> Total $22,481.55 <br /> <br /> Airport Legislation $19,173.34 <br /> 1,293.75 <br /> 30,665.58 <br /> Consultants 21,000.00 <br /> Total $72,132.67 <br /> Grand Total $94,614.22 <br /> Council legal Budget - $15,000.00 <br /> Transfer from Reserves $79,614.22 <br /> <br />An additional outstanding invoice remains for the Golf Course Billboard / Lease Project. In <br />negotiations, Eller Media agreed to pay $5,000.00 of the $20,347.40 bill. Staff requests a transfer <br />of $20,347.40 from General Fund Reserves for these legal expenses. Upon receiving the permits <br />and signed leases, Eller will be making additional payments to the City. At that time it can be <br />determined which department, budget or fund will be charged for the legal expenses related to <br />this project. <br /> <br />Legal expenses related to the update of the Personnel Policies also required additional hours due <br />to changes requested by Council during the process. An additional $4,500.00 is the amount <br />necessary to fulfill the City’s obligation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />In addition, approximately $15,000.00 has been billed for Non Retainer issues over the budgeted <br />amount thus far this year. Staff would also recommend a transfer of funding to accommodate