Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 8, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />stated with the City Manager form of government, there would be a City Manager, however, the <br />Council would also designate an individual on the staff to act as the clerk, to handle the record <br />keeping, etc. He explained that they would not necessarily have to create a new position, but <br />could simply designate that title, with a member of the existing staff filling that function. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated that currently, the Administrator serves as Clerk, and the Deputy Clerk <br />is also the Finance Director, who performs some of the functions of the Clerk. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long stated this was correct. He explained that this would not create a new <br />position, and they could simply utilize both the title of City Manager and the title of Clerk. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated he would like to ensure that this would not require the hiring of <br />additional personnel. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long advised that under Chapter 6.01, Subdivision 3, the Manager would appoint <br />the officers and employees, and also hires and fires them, except in the case of the hiring of <br />Department Heads which requires Council approval. He explained that the recommendation is <br />that if the Council does not approve the appointment within 30 days, the appointment is not <br />approved, which provides the Council with a ratification role with regard to the appointments. <br />He advised that currently, the Council is the appointing authority, and as such, they are <br />responsible for the hiring and firing of all personnel. He stated this would change, and the <br />Council would hire the City Manager, who in turn would be responsible for the hiring of all <br />personnel, with the exception of Department Heads, over which the Council would have some <br />ratification authority. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated it was his understanding that the city of Roseville’s Charter Commission <br />was moving toward similar language. <br /> <br />City Attorney stated one of the disadvantages of the current system is that the Council, as the <br />appointing authority, is required to become involved in every potential termination, therefore, if a <br />termination matter comes forward, it must be dealt with at the Council level, as opposed to the <br />City Manager level. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick pointed out that by eliminating some of the paperwork Council must <br />consider in dealing with all of the decisions they are called upon to make, the workload on <br />everyone would be reduced. He added that there would be no need to hire another employee if <br />there was less work. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated this would also assist in the expediency of running the day-to-day <br />operations of the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated Council Member Marty’s point was well made at the Work Session, in <br />that a perfect example of this was this entire Highway 10 safety and redevelopment issue. He <br />explained that a tragedy had occurred on Highway 10 which resulted in the death of a young boy, <br />however, Council had to wait two weeks to reconvene to provide staff direction in this regard. <br />He advised that some of this, such as examining the lighting and proposing solutions, should