My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2000/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agenda Packets - 2000/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:07:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/22/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 8, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br /> <br />someone simply did not care for the manner in which an individual was representing them for <br />four to six years, there would be very little they could do about it. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin commented he has not been particularly pleased with the President of the United <br />States during the past seven and a half years, and he has dealt with this. He explained that this is <br />simply the democratic process in action. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated there was partial consensus of the Council to direct legal staff to conduct <br />research in this regard. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long stated staff could provide some statistics for the Council, in terms of average <br />term lengths, and staff would also prepare some draft language that would accomplish four-year <br />terms for Mayor and six-year terms for Council Members, so that if they desire to move forward <br />in this process, it could be included with the other changes that are being contemplated. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty suggested that rather than tying up legal staff time, the Council could <br />direct Assistant to the City Administrator Reed to contact the League of Minnesota Cities <br />regarding the statistics. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long agreed, adding that legal staff would prepare the draft language. <br /> <br />C. Highway 10 Study Process. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated on March 13th, the Council approved a general <br />work plan and allocated funds to have Springsted & Associates facilitate discussions regarding <br />the future of Highway 10. He indicated that as staff has worked with Sprinsted to put some detail <br />to the study process, and they have come to the conclusion that changes to the work plan and <br />process originally proposed may be necessary. He explained that the original work plan focused <br />almost entirely upon community discussions to identity issues and priorities, however, as they <br />have examined all of the previous studies, it has become apparent that there has been <br />considerable community input, and it appears that most, if not all of the issues have been <br />identified at this point, therefore, it might be more appropriate to build upon those studies and <br />prepare a specific action plan that would focus upon those common elements, and allow them to <br />proceed to the next step of implementing improvements. He indicated a finance plan could also <br />be developed to assist the City in this regard. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated staff has discussed this matter with the <br />University of Minnesota Design Center, with regard to the role they might take to assist the City <br />in visualizing the possibilities, as well as how the I-35W Corridor discussion could assist in this <br />matter. He indicated representatives of Springsted were present to discuss the refocused study, <br />adding that staff desired to ensure that the Council was comfortable with this direction prior to <br />proceeding. He provided the Council with a memorandum that described the revisions to the <br />process. <br /> <br />Sharon _____ of Springsted & Associates stated the revised process came forward after they had <br />an opportunity to examine a number of the studies that have been done in the past, and to discuss <br />this matter with Community Development Director Jopke to obtain a sense of what might be a <br />means to synthesize all of the good work that has been done on the roadway study over the past
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.