Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin asked the Council if anyone would like to remove Items for discussion. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated he had inquired that date regarding items listed in Item A, Just and <br />Correct Claims, however, he had not yet received the responses. He indicated he did not object to <br />approving this item, with acknowledgement that he does not have the answers at this time, and <br />assuming the answers are satisfactory. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty requested Item C be removed from the Consent Agenda for further <br />discussion. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Approve the Consent Agenda for Items A, B, and D as <br />presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated Item C is the City’s agreement with Elegant Thymes Catering. He <br />indicated Article 2, which states “Termination may be made by either party without penalty or <br />cause” does not specify a time frame, however, Article 5 refers to a 30-day time period, and prior <br />to this, there is reference to a 180-day time period. He inquired if 30 days would be sufficient time <br />to obtain a new vendor, if the catering company were to terminate their contract. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long stated Finance Director Kessel has been involved in the substantive <br />negotiations of the terms of this agreement, however, he believed the practical effect of this <br />agreement is that in order to terminate, the caterer must provide 180 days notice before the end of <br />the initial term. He stated Article 2 pertains to termination without penalty or cause, and Article 5 <br />sets forth a two step process, which requires the City give a 30-day written notice of a failure to <br />meet conditions, and provides a 30-day time period in which to rectify this. He explained that this <br />actually translates into a 60-day time period, which could be extended if desired. He pointed out <br />that the last paragraph of Article 2 indicates that Elegant Times Catering may also terminate the <br />agreement by providing 60 days notice, therefore, the minimal amount of time the City would have <br />would be the 60 day notice period in those clauses, which would typically be acceptable. He <br />pointed out that they would not wish to lengthen the time period too extensively, as this might <br />result in being locked in to a problematic situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin clarified that the first item, which indicates 180 days, provides that either party <br />could terminate after 6 months. He explained that Article 2 is case specific, in that if the catering <br />company fails to meet the terms of the agreement, the City’s course of action would be to give <br />written notice, after which they would have a 30-day period in which to attempt to rectify the <br />situation. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated he was concerned that the catering company might decide to <br />terminate their contract at a time when there are a number of bookings scheduled. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long explained this would begin as a three year agreement with Elegant Thymes <br />Catering, unless either party were to give 180 day notice to terminate the contract for any reason. <br />He stated Article 2 specifies that if there is a failure to meet the terms of the contract, they would <br />either have to provide the City 30 days notice, or the City would have to provide them with 30 <br />days, which represents a 60-day time period. He indicated the last paragraph in Article 5 states