Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 28, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich explained that this would not be a possibility because this is a <br />controlled intersection with an identifiable crosswalk in place. <br /> <br />Mrs. Gunn inquired if the City would continue to have little control, when Ramsey County takes <br />ownership of the road. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the City has very little control at all. He advised that <br />upon the turnback of the road, Ramsey County would improve the road surface, upgrade the <br />signals to state of the art, install preemptive emergency vehicle controls, and improve the sight <br />lines and visions on the intersections. He indicated these are the major improvements that would <br />be made with the turnback funds they receive from MNDot. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich explained that there has recently been discussion regarding <br />providing an identifiable image for the City, in terms of slowing traffic speeds as vehicles come <br />into town, rather than having vehicles attempt to get from one point to another in the fastest <br />amount of time. He explained that this would involve certain types of trees, medians, sidewalks, <br />and items of this nature, which would be used to narrow the road, which consists of a 200-foot <br />right-of-way from one side to the other. He stated Highway 96, which has undergone new <br />construction, is a four-lane road with a 50 mile per hour speed limit. He pointed out that as he <br />drove down this road that date, 45 to 50 miles per hour appeared to be the appropriate speed, <br />because there are sidewalks, trees, and decorative plantings in the medians, and noise barriers on <br />the sides of the road. He explained however, as the road reaches Highway 10, the visibility <br />opens up, and there is nothing in the peripheral vision except wide-open spaces. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich advised that these are some of the things that might be done to <br />Highway 10, however, they would be quite expensive, because Ramsey County and Highway 10 <br />function properly, whereas old Highway 96 did not. He explained that Highway 96 was a two- <br />lane road, and the traffic counts had escalated to the point that four lanes were required. He <br />advised that the traffic counts have recently decreased on Highway 10 because of the opening of <br />the new freeway, however, they are projected to come back up in a few years, because the <br />Metropolitan area continues to expand and grow. He explained that there is significant cut- <br />through traffic on Highway 10, from areas to the north, during periods of snow, rain, and fog. <br /> <br />Mrs. Gunn stated Channel 9 television station had conducted a survey with regard to the stop and <br />go traffic, and indicated that MNDot was advising that in order to avoid these situations, traffic <br />should take major routes, which would include Highway 10. She inquired what could be done to <br />obtain the funds to correct this situation. She inquired how many suburbs have a major highway <br />extending through the middle of their community. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the City could continue to lobby Ramsey County as they <br />discuss what is going to occur with the road, and what the City would like to see in this regard. <br />He explained that initially they should have a plan that is acceptable to the community, and in <br />accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, in order to attempt to made improvements to the road. <br />He stated they were in the business of making traffic safe and efficient, and creating a good <br />environment for other modes of transportation. He explained that it would cost the City of <br />Mounds View a large amount of money to obtain the amenities that have been utilized on <br />Highway 96, however, Ramsey County would contribute a portion of this.