My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2000/02/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agenda Packets - 2000/02/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:28 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:47:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/14/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/14/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 8, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />C. Approve Resolution No. 5321, Authorizing the Golf Course Superintendent <br />to Investigate the Process of Placing Billboards on Golf Course and Adjacent <br />Property, Including Making Application to the Planning Commission. <br />D. Set a Public Hearing for March 22, 1999, at 7:10 P.M., Concerning a <br />Conditional Use Permit for an Outdoor Flower Mart for Linders <br />Greenhouses, Inc. to be Located at Moundsview Square. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin asked the Council if anyone would like to remove Items for discussion. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney requested Item A and C be removed from the Consent Agenda for <br />additional discussion. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Approve the Consent Agenda for Items B and D, as <br />presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney requested clarification regarding a claim settlement the City paid to the <br />League of Minnesota Cities in the amount of $2,124.50. He stated it was his understanding that <br />this matter pertained to a pickup truck which was impounded by the City, and towed to the <br />impound lot, where it was crushed, and this amount was to settle the resulting legal suit, because <br />the City was not supposed to have done this. He indicated he had asked the City Administrator <br />what the City’s policy was, and how they could insure that this would not happen again. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated he further understood that the League of Minnesota Cities, as the <br />City’s insurer, made this settlement unbeknownst to the City, and paid the claimant. He <br />requested clarification regarding these points. <br /> <br />City Administrator Whiting stated this was essentially correct, and this incident occurred at some <br />time during the last two years. He indicated he contacted the League of Minnesota Cities, and <br />spoke to the insurance agent that was overseeing this matter. He explained that at some point <br />between impounding the vehicle and settling this case, the vehicle remained on the lot, however, <br />due to the procedural understanding between the City and the impound lot, the vehicle was <br />inadvertently destroyed, unbeknownst to staff. <br /> <br />City Administrator Whiting stated the vehicle owner made a claim against the City, and the <br />attorneys for the League of Minnesota Cities arrived at this amount as a settlement. He noted <br />since he had spoken with Council Member Stigney regarding this matter that date, he had been <br />unable to contact the attorneys who pursued this case. He stated the League of Minnesota Cities <br />was working on the City’s behalf, even though this settlement would come out of the City’s <br />$10,000 deductible, which is why it was listed on the bills and warrants. <br /> <br />City Administrator Whiting stated he was not aware that anything of this nature had occurred in <br />the past, and it certainly has not happened since, however, staff may have to review the policy <br />and procedure with the Chief of Police, in order to prevent it from ever reoccurring. He <br />indicated that the League of Minnesota Cities felt that blame was not obvious to the City or to <br />the impound vendor, however, there was a lack of communication or understanding regarding <br />what was supposed to happen, and this resulted in the vehicle being crushed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.