My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2000/02/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agenda Packets - 2000/02/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:28 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:47:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/14/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/14/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />if the Council was not comfortable with the amount of discussion at the last Work Session, <br />perhaps other questions pertaining to the overall picture of the finances at the golf course could <br />be addressed at an upcoming Work Session. <br /> <br />City Administrator Whiting pointed out that two additional questions had come forward <br />regarding how this consideration relates to other City trucks, particularly those in the Public <br />Works Department, and whether or not there is a truck which could be utilized for this purpose. <br />He indicated there was also the matter of the personal use of vehicles, which has come forward <br />on occasion, and possibly warrants discussion as well. He stated he had not seen anything of <br />concern in this regard. He noted that through speaking with Mr. Hammerschmidt, and based <br />upon the location of his residence, it would appear to be cost effective to take a truck home, in <br />order to pick up a load on the way to the golf course, or to have the vehicle maintained. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin advised that the discussion should be germane to the postponement. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated in light of the Staff Report, and the fact that they were beginning to see <br />50-degree temperatures, it was simply a matter of time before the frost would be off the ground, <br />and the golf course could be opened. He advised that the sooner this occurs, the better, adding <br />that the better the quality of the golf course, the more it would be utilized, and people would be <br />willing to pay their hard-earned cash to do so. He stated the Staff Report had provided answers <br />to the majority of questions he had in this regard, and for this reason, he would oppose the <br />postponement. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney inquired how postponing the decision until after the April 5 Work <br />Session would be detrimental to anything they were proposing to do at the golf course, and why <br />this could not be resolved in conjunction with utilizing a vehicle from the Public Works <br />Department. <br /> <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt indicated he was not clear regarding the Public Works Department <br />schedule, in terms of available vehicles. He advised that the previous Council had discussed <br />how the golf course could do a quid quo pro with other departments, when the golf course is an <br />enterprise unit. He explained that in the past, as the Golf Course Director, he has performed <br />certain tasks such as spraying the parks, and has used Parks and Recreation Department <br />equipment at the golf course, which was the nature of this agreement. He pointed out that <br />previous Council’s have directed the golf course to be certain they remain separate, and not <br />utilize City-owned or other City facilities to make the golf course successful. <br /> <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt stated the Public Works Department has no tracking method by which to <br />charge for equipment, and even if there was a Public Works truck available for the year, there <br />was an issue regarding how the charges would be calculated, and who would set the price. He <br />indicated he had discussed this matter with Director of Public Works Ulrich, who advised that <br />during the same period of time they become busy, the workers for both the parks the streets are <br />utilizing the vehicles, therefore, it was his understanding that no vehicle would be available. <br /> <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt stated he could not schedule the use of a truck, because he did not know in <br />advance when they could proceed with the project. He explained that much this would relate to <br />the timing between the busy morning crowd, and busy leagues. He indicated that oftentimes <br />there is an hour and a half window, between noon and 1:30 p.m. during which the work can be <br />done, however, that may be all they are able to accomplish on that particular day. He stated that
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.