Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich indicated the proposed project has received Park Board <br />approval. He stated the previous Parks and Recreation Director had taken this proposal before <br />the Board, which saw this as a good site for a passive park. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he had also spoken with Director of Public Works Ulrich regarding <br />options of looking into the property that would be created with the realignment of Edgewood <br />Drive. He pointed out that the Council has expressed a desire to relocate the holding pond to the <br />other side of the street, and there may be some potential to work with this land in terms of <br />mitigating the Community Center wetland as well. He stated he had brought this forward late in <br />the day, therefore, the Public Works Director has been unable to obtain the opinion of the City <br />engineers, however, this may be another option. He indicated although he would like to obtain <br />as much public comment as possible at this time, he was inclined to continue the matter until <br />staff has had the opportunity to explore other options. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated the question regarding the use of this area has been put to the <br />public in a survey, in the latest edition of the Mounds View Matters. He indicated that if the <br />residents complete this survey, and return it to City Hall, it could assist in the decision regarding <br />whether or not to have a wetland adjacent to City Hall, and possibly developing this area, or <br />maintaining the area as green space. He stated public comments were welcome and necessary. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich advised that the reason the entire park was proposed for this <br />project was the possibility that they could create approximately 1.5 acres of wetland bank. He <br />noted there were some discussions with the Ramsey County Soil and Water Resource Board, as <br />well as various engineering opinions and observations regarding this site. He explained that <br />these observations, further research into the soil borings, and actual samples would be available <br />in approximately two weeks. He indicated that if they determine the entire park could be turned <br />back into a wetland, this would result in approximately 1.5 acres of wetland credit. He explained <br />that this is very close to the amount of acreage that would be required in the future, if Silver Lake <br />Road is reconstructed, and a trail placed along the entire length, from County Road H, to Trunk <br />Highway 10. He stated the 1.5 acres of wetland credit could be utilized for this purpose, sold, or <br />banked for other purposes. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin pointed out that in light of the fact that the soil borings would be submitted in <br />two weeks, it would behoove the Council to continue this discussion until this information is <br />available. He indicated however, the Council would welcome the comments of the public at this <br />time. <br /> <br />Jerry Galvin, 5080 Long View Drive stated his home was approximately two houses from <br />Woodcrest Park. He indicated that it was difficult on the weekend at any given time, not to see <br />someone playing in this park. He stated the Woodcrest Park was supposed to have been <br />completed 30 years ago, and some type of a fence was supposed to have been constructed along <br />the ditch. He stated he understood there was a significant wetland problem in this area. He <br />indicated he also understood the City was not completely prepared for the public hearing at this <br />time. <br /> <br />Mr. Galvin stated he had seen no drawings of this proposal, however, he expected to examine the <br />drawings before the decisions were finalized. He indicated he has been a resident of Mounds <br />View for 40 years, and his children play in Woodcrest Park. He stated there were four parks on <br />the north side of Highway 10, and 2 to the south, however he could not see sending a 5 or 6 year-