My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-06-2000 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
03-06-2000 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:47 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:57:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/6/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/6/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
March 2, 2000 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable mayor and City Council <br />From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator <br />Re: Monday, March 6, 2000 City Council Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />In light of the tragic accident of last Friday, staff is preparing to bring to the meeting as <br />much information about Highway 10, the pedestrian bridge and the aftermath of the <br />accident as possible. I have arranged the agenda to facilitate the review and discussion. I <br />think everyone feels it is important to find both short and long-term actions that can be <br />taken in reaction to this accident. From some of the calls I have received from residents, <br />there is a normal frustration in feeling enough can’t get done fast enough, but there is also <br />a sense being shared with me that coordinating an effort to satisfactorily respond is also a <br />concern. <br /> <br />Item 1 – Review of Highway 10 Issues: With the attention now being focused on <br />Highway 10 related matters, it seems the first thing needed is to review the voluminous <br />work that has been done that either never came to fruition or was rejected. At the same <br />time, reality again confronts the City as another Highway 10 project is on the agenda, the <br />Pleasant View Drive traffic signal and design. While I may be speaking as the outgoing <br />administrator, I would like to comment at the meeting about the need to make decisions <br />better, and just what it may take to address Highway 10 issues for the long term. <br /> <br />Council will be receiving a large volume of materials that may or may not have been <br />sorted out by packet time. At Tuesday’s staff meeting, all department heads were asked <br />to prepared and gather any information that may be helpful for the Council and <br />community to respond to this incident. On the agenda, we are starting with the numerous <br />studies and attempts to deal with all or parts of the Highway 10 corridor. Being sensitive <br />to criticism that this is all just talk, it is still necessary to have some review particularly if <br />there is to be submittals for funds requiring plans. Council will probably note this issue <br />has been before the community on many occasions and from different vantage points. <br /> <br />Some specific inquiries that have been made are responded to in enclosed staff memos. <br />I’ll touch on some here: <br /> <br />Can the City accept donations from people for a bridge, a monument, a tree, etc? <br />Yes, Bruce’s memo touches on this. I have said to people that we will, but for the time <br />being the City may want to wait to see whether the family needs to arrange a repository <br />first, so as not to get their needs confused with something for the City to do. <br /> <br />What can MNDOT and Ramsey County do about this? MNDOT has turned the <br />highway over to Ramsey County, but is forwarding historical data on traffic, accidents <br />and other pertinent information the City may want to review in order to make a good
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.