My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-07-2000 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-07-2000 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:19 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 3:06:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/7/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/7/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\City Council\Work Session Packets\02-07-00\City Administrator's Memo.doc <br />February 2, 2000 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator <br />Re: February 7, 2000 City Council Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />Here’s what we have for the work session on Monday: <br /> <br />Item 1: Review of Golf Course Sign Bids - Chuck Whiting, John Hammerschmidt: <br />The golf course sign bids have come in and will be reviewed with the Council on <br />Monday night. The Golf Course Committee should actually meet prior to the Council <br />and review this, so they will on late Monday afternoon. While the bids should be <br />reviewed, the Council should use this opportunity to determine what you like and don’t <br />like, and what questions you may have that can be followed up on during the rest of the <br />week. Two things will need to come from the work session, first, an indication of the <br />preferred bid, and second an understanding that a conditional use permit will need to be <br />applied for from the City to allow the selected sign to be constructed. John is drafting a <br />resolution authorizing staff to submit that application on behalf of the City and that <br />should be ready for review on Monday. Action on both the preferred bid and the <br />resolution to submit the CUP would be on the February 14 meeting agenda. <br /> <br />Item 2: Review of Survey RFPs - Chuck Whiting: I still have two days to go to <br />Receive survey RFPs. So far I have only received two. Decision Resources did call to <br />state they will not work with City based on the current composition of the Council. I <br />find this discouraging but not unexpected. <br /> <br />Item 3: Preview of March 2 All City Council City Boards Appreciation Dinner - <br />Chuck Whiting: In trying to get a handle on the significance of this meeting, I thought it <br />best to review particulars with the Council. First, the number of people to attend will <br />affect the cost of the dinner. The following boards exist for the City: <br /> <br />City Council – 5 members, 2 staff <br />Planning Commission – 9 members, 2 staff <br />Parks and Recreation – 7 members, 1 staff <br />Cable Commission – 5 members <br />Economic Development Commission – 7 members, 1 staff <br />Civil Service Commission – 3 members, 1 staff <br />Golf Course Committee – 2 staff <br />Charter Commission – 15 members <br /> <br />This is 61 positions, recognizing some people and staff fill more than one position. With <br />the invitation of spouses or significant others this doubles to 122. If the Council wishes <br />to add outgoing board members from 1999, additional spaces would be generated. <br />Roughly speaking, it appears that if as many as 150 were to be invited, the cost for the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.