Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 3 <br />Meeting Date: December 4, 2000 <br />Type of Business: WS <br />WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor & City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Discussion Regarding the Highway 10 Design <br />Consultant RFP <br />Date of Report: November 30, 2000 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Based on meetings with City staff, the Highway 10 Steering Committee and <br />representatives of the business community, Springsted has prepared a draft Request <br />For Proposals (RFP) for a design consultant to develop and recommend a Highway 10 <br />reconstruction and revitalization plan. The RFP is identified as one of the short-term <br />administrative actions to support the approved Highway 10 Action Plan. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The attached draft RFP, which received a very thorough review from the Highway 10 <br />Steering Committee, is being presented to the Council for its consideration to ensure <br />that the document adequately represents the intent and desire of the Council in its <br />mission to address and respond to pedestrian and vehicle safety concerns within the <br />Highway 10 corridor and to examine and evaluate opportunities to change the <br />appearance of the corridor from a freeway to a community boulevard. <br /> <br />The RFP begins by providing an overview of Mounds View and the defining events that <br />have resulted in the desire for contracting with a design consultant. Eight detailed <br />tasks are identified in the Scope of Services section of the RFP to which the qualified <br />design consultant will need to respond. (Desired qualifications are identified in <br />Section III.) The RFP instructs the respondents as to the structure and order of the <br />responses to facilitate ease of review and comparison of the submitted proposals. <br />Section V identifies the terms and conditions of the proposal and selected consultant. <br />The proposals will be evaluated according to a clearly defined set of criteria, which are <br />listed in Section VII. Last, the RFP establishes a timeline for the processing of the <br />proposals, selection of the consultant and commencement of the project. <br /> <br />Representatives from Springsted will be on hand to discuss the draft RFP and to <br />respond to any questions the Council may have. The final draft of the RFP will be <br />presented to the City Council for its approval on December 11, 2000, after which <br />point the RFP would be distributed and made available to design consultants. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Please review the attached draft RFP and provide any input to staff and Springsted <br />regarding its construction. <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />