My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2000/12/04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agenda Packets - 2000/12/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:27 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 3:50:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/4/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/4/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 5 <br />Meeting Date: December 4, 2000 <br />Type of Business: WS <br />WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor & City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Discussion Regarding a Request to Excavate within <br />a Designated Wetland to Restore Open Water and <br />to promote Wildlife Habitat, 7373 and 7375 <br />Knollwood Drive <br />Date of Report: November 30, 2000 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />On October 31, 2000, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) approved permits to <br />allow for the excavation and alteration of designated wetlands on properties located at <br />7373 and 7375 Knollwood Drive. The applicants desired to remove some of the <br />sediment that had built up within the designated wetlands to restore the open-water <br />features of the wetland. This had been done once before in 1955 for the same <br />purpose. <br /> <br />On November 6, 2000, staff sent letters to the two property owners indicating that in <br />addition to a RCWD permit, the City had its own wetland zoning regulations which <br />would necessitate approval of a wetland alteration permit and a grading permit. <br />Three days later on November 9th, the two property owners submitted the application <br />for a wetland alteration permit. Refer to the attached applications and the Wetland <br />Zoning Map which illustrates the subject parcels, the assumed wetland boundary and <br />that of the 100-foot buffer. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Staff has forwarded copies of the approved RCWD permits and the City applications to <br />SEH, Inc., for its review. They have responded that the impact to the wetland would <br />be minimal and could in fact produce a positive net result in terms of the wetland’s <br />flood storage capacity and ability to provide habitat for a more diverse animal <br />population and allow for greater varieties of wetland vegetation. <br /> <br />In order for a wetland alteration permit to be approved, the standards and criteria <br />identified in Chapter 1010 of the Municipal Code need to be addressed to the <br />satisfaction of the City Council. (This section of the Code is attached for the Council’s <br />easy reference.) Staff fully expects that the request(s) will more than satisfy the <br />standards. <br /> <br />The Council may want to discuss whether or not there may be some benefit in <br />deferring to Rice Creek Watershed District on wetland alterations in some situations, <br />rather than requiring an applicant to obtain a RCWD permit and then a duplicative <br />City permit. If directed, staff could confer with RCWD staff and SEH staff and report <br />back to the Council at a later date. In the meantime, if the Council has no objections,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.