My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2000 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
11-08-2000 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:59 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 3:51:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/8/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Little Woods Report <br />November 8, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Background on 8283 Long Lake Road and the HRP Program: <br /> <br />The City purchased the property at 8283 Long Lake Road in March of 1997 at a cost <br />of $50,500. (As can be seen in Figure 4, the value of the land alone has increased <br />almost to what the City initially paid for the land and the house.) Since that time, <br />staff has been before the Council/EDA on more than one occasion regarding the long <br />range plan for this property, the consensus being to not market the lot on its own, <br />but rather to retain the property and market it as a component of a much larger <br />development. From these meetings with the Council, staff had been directed to <br />explore purchasing the adjoining properties, which are currently used as rental <br />dwellings by their respective owners. The homes are very small and could be <br />considered “blighted” under the criteria established in the HRP guidelines. (Refer to <br />Figure 3.) The current HRP guidelines however restrict purchases to owner-occupied <br />homes only, due in large part to the cost of the relocation benefits to which the City <br />would be subject. The alternative would be to use the City’s lot as an incentive for a <br />developer to purchase and redevelop the adjoining parcels. Before this type of <br />scenario can move forward, however, the development potential along unimproved <br />Woodlawn and Laport Drives must be determined. The recently completed <br />hydrological study answers this question to a large extent. <br /> <br />Figure 3. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.