My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2000/11/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agenda Packets - 2000/11/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:59 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 3:51:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/8/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Little Woods Report <br />November 8, 2000 <br />Page 6 <br />area set aside for street right of way, the density becomes 2.34 units per acre. (In <br />comparison, the minimum lot size in Mounds View is 11,000 square feet, which <br />translates into a density of 3.96 units per acre.) The value of these lots, given the <br />tree coverage and other natural amenities, could be as much as $50,000 or more. <br />Altogether, the 34 lots could be valued at 1.7 million dollars. <br /> <br />This plat scenario is based on a number of assumptions. First, the two blighted rental <br />homes would be removed in this development and two additional lots with existing <br />homes (8247 Long Lake Road and 8133 Woodlawn Drive) would be subdivided. In <br />addition to those four lots, there are eight other privately held lots which would need <br />to be purchased or whose owners would need to sign off on the plat and be <br />compensated in some other way, such as by retaining control over one or more of the <br />replatted lots. As mentioned previously in this report, if the City wishes to utilize <br />those lots for which it holds use deeds, it could anticipate paying triple the assessed <br />value to purchase the lots. Given that assumption, the City could anticipate paying as <br />much as $578,000 to acquire the rights to develop the County parcels. To offset that <br />potential cost, staff would explore other various funding and grant options. <br /> <br />One of the keys to this or any replatting of this area would be to preserve as much of <br />the natural area as possible. The contour of the proposed road follows the contour of <br />the wetland yet is setback a minimum of 125 feet. All of the home sites east and <br />north of the proposed street would fall within the wetland buffer, thus precautions <br />would need to be implemented to protect and preserve the wetland. Trees and the <br />wooded areas would be preserved to every extent possible, clearing only those areas <br />necessary for soil corrections and construction. <br /> <br />The other key to this or any development is to make it pedestrian friendly and to <br />emphasize and showcase the natural areas without detracting from or spoiling their <br />aesthetic beauty and function. A pathway is shown along the north side of the <br />proposed street as well as connecting to Sherwood Drive and Long Lake Road by <br />pathway extensions. A pathway could be added to the north side of the wetland as <br />shown on the plat to connect Ardan Park to the new development and to the <br />neighborhoods to the south and east. <br /> <br />Tax Base Impacts: <br /> <br />Any development in this area would of course have a positive impact to the City’s tax <br />base. Currently, the eight privately-held undeveloped parcels annually contribute a <br />cumulative $22 to the City in property taxes. The other parcels over which the City <br />holds use deeds generate no property taxes. Based on the above plat scenario with <br />34 lots, assuming minimum assessed values of $150,000 per lot (could be higher), <br />the amount of taxes annually generated for the City would be $17,204 based on 2000 <br />assessment rates. <br /> <br />Public Input: <br /> <br />For a subdivision of this scale, it would be very important to involve the adjoining <br />residents in every step of the process. It would be staff’s recommendation to hold a <br />public meeting, open to everyone having an interest in the development, once some
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.