Laserfiche WebLink
Review of Ords 658 & 664 <br />July 17, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />• Three accessory buildings are allowed instead of two. <br /> <br />• Limit of one garage eliminated. <br /> <br />• “Size of accessory building not to exceed footprint of house” requirement <br />eliminated altogether. <br /> <br />• Distinction between garage and shed eliminated—simply referred to as <br />accessory buildings. <br /> <br />There are other changes contemplated by Ordinance 664, some of which are minor <br />and “housekeeping” in nature, while other changes simply clarify the Code and <br />address “setback” issues which, up to this point, the Code has been silent on. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Please review and discuss the two attached ordinances. If the Council should have <br />any questions regarding either ordinance, staff would be happy to respond either at <br />the worksession or sometime before the meeting. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson, Planner <br /> <br />Attachments: <br /> <br />1. Ordinance 658 <br />2. Ordinance 664 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />J:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\SPECPROJ\SP079-00\July 17, 2000 Council Memo.doc