Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission March 7, 2018 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Farmer questioned if this project would enhance the City’s tax base. City <br />Planner/Supervisor Sevald reported after the TIF note had reached its term, the City’s tax base <br />would be increased. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klander inquired how inaction by the Commission would impact this project. <br />City Planner/Supervisor Sevald reported a Public Hearing has been posted for this item on <br />Monday, March 12th for the City Council. For this reason, he encouraged the Commission to <br />make a recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br />Chair Klebsch stated she was a little disappointed to not see the pro forma in the Commission’s <br />packet. She commented on the “but for” test and believed this was somewhat subjective. <br />However, she trusted the recommendation from Ehlers. She expressed frustration with the fact <br />that it appeared the Commission’s hands were tied on this issue. She stated she would like to <br />learn more about the City’s housing goals. She explained she did not appreciate the lack of <br />transparency for this project both with the Commission and the public. She indicated she has <br />received emails from the public voicing concerns and questions. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Stevenson. To approve Resolution <br />1082-18, a Resolution Finding that a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mounds <br />View Economic Development Project and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment <br />Financing District No. 1-6 Conform to the General Plans for the Development and <br />Redevelopment of the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson thanked staff and Mr. Lehnhoff for their thorough presentations on <br />TIF. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monn requested the PowerPoint presentation from Ehlers be forwarded to the <br />Planning Commissioners. Mr. Lehnhoff stated he would forward this information to the <br />Commissioners. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 3 (French, Klander, and Monn) Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />B. Resolution 1083-18, Amending the City Code, Section 1104.01, Subd 5, <br />regarding the Encroachment of Front Porches (Special Planning Case SP- <br />212-18) <br /> <br />City Planner/Supervisor Sevald stated within residential zoning districts, the minimum front yard <br />setback is 30’ from the property line. On occasion (1-2 times per year), homeowners have <br />inquired if a front porch can be added onto a home. If the home is at the minimum setback, a <br />front porch would not be permitted, unless a variance is granted by the Planning Commission. In <br />order for the Planning Commission to grant a variance, a “Practical Difficulty” or “Hardship” <br />must be proven. In Staff’s opinion, this is difficult to provide because a front porch is an