My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-18-2016
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
05-18-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 6:32:03 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 6:31:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/18/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 5C <br />Meeting Date: May 18, 2016 <br />Type of Business: Planning Case MU2016-001 <br /> <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Jon Sevald, Planner <br />Re: Consider Resolution 1050-16, a Resolution denying a Variance for use of <br />non-amber colors on a Ground Sign with a Dynamic Display, to be located at <br />2848 Co Rd H2; Planning Case MU2016-001 (VR2016-003). <br />Date: May 18, 2016 <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction <br />Messiah Lutheran Church would like to replace their existing 8’ X 4’ ground sign at the <br />corner of Co Rd H2 and Knollwood Dr. with an 8’ X 5’ multi-colored Dynamic Display <br />sign at the same location. Dynamic Display signs in residential zoned districts must <br />utilize amber colored lights.1 <br /> <br />Messiah Lutheran Church has applied for three permits: (1) Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP) for a Dynamic Display Sign in a non-business district; (2) Variance to setback; <br />and (3) Variance for non-amber color. The permits may be discussed together, but <br />must be acted upon separately (separate Public Hearings). The City Council will <br />conduct the Public Hearing for the CUP. The Planning Commission, acting as the <br />Board of Adjustment, will conduct the Public Hearings for the Variances. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />The City Code was amended in 2011, regarding Dynamic Display signs (Ord. 864). <br />The amendment dealt with Billboards, the frequency of message changes; sign <br />brightness; broadcasting of Amber Alerts; and the restricted use of the color amber in <br />non0-business districts, because amber is a softer color. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted two sign plans, one utilizing an amber dynamic display <br />area, and one multi-colored. <br /> <br />Staff is recommending denial of the Variance for a lack of a hardship. It is Staff’s <br />opinion that the dynamic display sign can effectively communicate messages without <br />the use of multiple colors. <br /> <br /> <br />1 City Code, Section 1008.10, Subd 9(c)(2)(b) <br /> <br />M E M O <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.