Laserfiche WebLink
-DRAFT- <br /> <br />Mr. Olestad offered a final comment to the Commission stating his proposed home would be in <br />alignment with the other homes on the street and only the garage would be slightly forward. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson questioned if the Planning Commission required any additional information <br />from staff prior to October 5th. No additional information was requested. Staff was directed to <br />bring this item back to the Planning Commission on October 5th. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />B. Consider Resolution 1056-16, a Resolution recommending approval of the <br />Preliminary Plat of Steil Addition; Planning Case MA2016-001 <br /> <br />Planner Sevald stated the applicants Tim and Kelly Steil own two adjacent properties that back <br />up to each other. The Steil’s are requesting to move the common property line, thereby <br />increasing the size of their backyard at their residence at 7255 Hidden Hollow Court. No new <br />lots or roads will be created. Because the two lots involved exceed 2-acres combined, a Major <br />Subdivision is required. Staff reviewed the request in further detail and recommended the <br />Planning Commission recommend approval of the request. <br /> <br />Tim Steil, 7255 Hidden Hollow Court, thanked the Commission for considering his request. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson questioned if a park dedication fee would be required. Planner Sevald <br />explained park dedication fees are only due if a new lot was created. This did not apply with the <br />Steil’s request. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Klebsch/Commissioner Schiltgen. To approve Resolution <br />1056-16, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Major Subdivision at 7255 Hidden Hollow <br />Court; Planning Case No. MA2016-001. <br /> <br /> Ayes –5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />A. Planning Commission Quorum <br /> <br />Planner Sevald stated at the September 7th Planning Commission meeting, there was not a <br />quorum present to approve a Variance. Staff reviewed the City’s quorum and voting <br />requirements in detail with the Commission. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />