Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 5, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />A. (Continued) Consider Resolution 1055-16, a Resolution approving/denying a <br />Variance for a 30’ front yard setback at 7790 Eastwood Road; Planning Case <br />VR2016-04 <br /> <br />Planner Sevald stated the applicant (Value Homes, LLC) is requesting a Variance to reduce the <br />front yard setback from 54’ to 30’ to construct a single-family home at 7790 Eastwood Road. <br />The minimum front yard setback in the R-1 district is 30’ unless homes on the same side of the <br />street have a greater setback (54’ in this case). The request is due to the hardship of a private <br />drainage easement reducing the developable area of the lot. The Planning Commission <br />conducted a Public Hearing on September 7, 2016, and continued the Hearing to September 21, <br />2016, taking no action. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald explained the property at 7800 Eastwood Road was subdivided into two lots in <br />March, 2016. The north lot includes an existing home, and the south lot is the subject property <br />(7790 Eastwood Road). After the subdivision was approved, the developer conducted a Title <br />Search, which revealed two private easements: (1) a 10’ wide sidewalk easement in the SE <br />corner of the lot; and (2) a 30’ wide surface drainage & storm water easement along the south <br />property line. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald indicated the two easements are for the adjacent property, Silver Lake Commons <br />apartments. As part of Silver Lake Common’s Development Review in 1997, the City required <br />the apartment owner to obtain a drainage easement from 7800 Eastwood Road. At that time, <br />there was concern that expansion of the apartments would negatively affect the natural drainage <br />flow from properties north of the apartments (1940 aerial photo suggests a drainage ditch flowed <br />through these properties). An easement was obtained, but a storm water retention pond was never <br />constructed within the easement, nor was a sidewalk. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald reported prior to the Title Search, neither the developer nor the current property <br />owner (Value Homes) knew about the easements. For a Minor Subdivision, a Title Search is not <br />required prior to plat approval, but prior to recording the plat at Ramsey County (City Code, <br />Section 1202.01, Subd 2(b). Due to the private drainage easement and the 54’ front yard <br />building setback requirement, the developable area of the lot is significantly reduced. Staff <br />recommends approval of the Variance contingent upon complying with the conditions in <br />Resolution 1055-16. It is Staff’s opinion that the Variance request is reasonable considering that <br />the location of the private drainage easement greatly reduces the developable area of the lot. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald reviewed the seven criteria to be considered in granting a variance, stating that <br />the Public Hearing has been opened and closed, and that it is up to the Chair if to accept <br />comments from the public. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated that there are several questions with this case, and stated that he saw no <br />reason to hold another Public Hearing given the fact there were no neighbors in attendance. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson recalled the concerns of the neighbors as discussed at the previous meetings and <br />reviewed the shape of the subject lot noting the easements on site. He requested staff review the