My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2016
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
11-16-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 6:42:03 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 6:41:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/16/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 5, 2016 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />A. (Continued) Consider Resolution 1055-16, a Resolution approving/denying a <br />Variance for a 30’ front yard setback at 7790 Eastwood Road; Planning Case <br />VR2016-04 <br /> <br />Planner Sevald stated the applicant (Value Homes, LLC) is requesting a Variance to reduce the <br />front yard setback from 54’ to 30’ to construct a single-family home at 7790 Eastwood Road. <br />The minimum front yard setback in the R-1 district is 30’ unless homes on the same side of the <br />street have a greater setback (54’ in this case). The request is due to the hardship of a private <br />drainage easement reducing the developable area of the lot. The Planning Commission <br />conducted a Public Hearing on September 7, 2016, and continued the Hearing to September 21, <br />2016, taking no action. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald explained the property at 7800 Eastwood Road was subdivided into two lots in <br />March, 2016. The north lot includes an existing home, and the south lot is the subject property <br />(7790 Eastwood Road). After the subdivision was approved, the developer conducted a Title <br />Search, which revealed two private easements: (1) a 10’ wide sidewalk easement in the SE <br />corner of the lot; and (2) a 30’ wide surface drainage & storm water easement along the south <br />property line. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald indicated the two easements are for the adjacent property, Silver Lake Commons <br />apartments. As part of Silver Lake Common’s Development Review in 1997, the City required <br />the apartment owner to obtain a drainage easement from 7800 Eastwood Road. At that time, <br />there was concern that expansion of the apartments would negatively affect the natural drainage <br />flow from properties north of the apartments (1940 aerial photo suggests a drainage ditch flowed <br />through these properties). An easement was obtained, but a storm water retention pond was never <br />constructed within the easement, nor was a sidewalk. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald reported prior to the Title Search, neither the developer nor the current property <br />owner (Value Homes) knew about the easements. For a Minor Subdivision, a Title Search is not <br />required prior to plat approval, but prior to recording the plat at Ramsey County (City Code, <br />Section 1202.01, Subd 2(b). Due to the private drainage easement and the 54’ front yard <br />building setback requirement, the developable area of the lot is significantly reduced. Staff <br />recommends approval of the Variance contingent upon complying with the conditions in <br />Resolution 1055-16. It is Staff’s opinion that the Variance request is reasonable considering that <br />the location of the private drainage easement greatly reduces the developable area of the lot. <br /> <br />Planner Sevald reviewed the seven criteria to be considered in granting a variance, stating that <br />the Public Hearing has been opened and closed, and that it is up to the Chair if to accept <br />comments from the public. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated that there are several questions with this case, and stated that he saw no <br />reason to hold another Public Hearing given the fact there were no neighbors in attendance. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson recalled the concerns of the neighbors as discussed at the previous meetings and <br />reviewed the shape of the subject lot noting the easements on site. He requested staff review the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.