Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 20, 2015 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Commissioner Birken explained that Mr. Horbul had a very nice home and she appreciated the <br />fact that Mr. Horbul stored his recreational toys within his oversized garage. She discussed the <br />City’s variance law and believed that the request did not meet all of the variance requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Horbul commented that the driveway was original since 1977 and he was simply requesting <br />that the driveway width remain as is. <br /> <br />Associate Heller reported that driveway width requirements have always been limited by the <br />City, first to 22 feet and then 24 feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Love believed that the variance criteria were open to interpretation. It was her <br />opinion that traffic safety would not be compromised if the driveway was to remain 34 feet wide. <br />In addition, she thought the driveway width would not negatively impact the aesthetics of the <br />neighborhood. She explained that the unique circumstances could be construed to be the fact <br />that the property owner purchased the home with the existing driveway width and curb cut. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Schiltgen understood the safety concerns, but questioned how much traffic was <br />moving along Knollwood Drive. <br /> <br />Mr. Horbul discussed the traffic along Knollwood Drive stating the traffic speed was increasing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kieffer questioned the length of Mr. Horbul’s driveway. <br /> <br />Mr. Horbul was uncertain. <br /> <br />Commissioner Birken believed that the variance criteria was not being met in Mr. Horbul’s <br />request and explained that all other residents in Mounds View were able to back their trailers and <br />fish houses into their garage with a 24-foot wide apron. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Schiltgen agreed. <br /> <br />Mr. Horbul reiterated that he was not asking for anymore apron than he already had. He simply <br />wanted the apron put back to the same condition it was when he purchased his home. <br /> <br />George Grone, 8424 Knollwood Drive, did not believe that Mr. Horbul’s driveway looked out of <br />place. He recommended that the driveway and apron be allowed to remain as is. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Schiltgen closed the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Elofson/Commissioner Birken. To approve Resolution <br />1027-15, a Resolution Recommending Denial of a Variance for a Curb Cut to Exceed 24-Feet <br />Wide at 8382 Knollwood Drive; Planning Case No. VR2015-002. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 2 (Kieffer and Love) Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br />B. VR2015-003 Variance Request to Allow a Driveway with a 2-foot Setback