Laserfiche WebLink
~ounds View City Council <br />egular Meeting <br />Page Seven <br />April 27, 1992 <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked if the $13,000 was salary only or did <br />it include benefits. <br />Minetor stated it did include benefits. <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, commented that she and Ric had <br />met with individuals from Fridley, Arden Hills, Shoreview and New <br />Brighton to consider sharing a building inspector which would <br />lower costs and keep the services to the residents. Orduno <br />stated that each City had the same problem, they needed a full time <br />building inspector. Mayor Linke stated that it is important that the <br />housing inspections don't fall away as they are badly needed. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />7. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reviewed <br />Staff Report No. 92-246C regarding authorizing the Director of <br />Public Works to sign easements for Long Lake Road construction on <br />behalf of the City of Mounds View. Minetor stated that there are over <br />100 temporary easements to be signed. These easements do not have to <br />be filed at the County and will expire after the construction is <br />completed. These easements could be handled less formally and be <br />signed by the Director of Public Works. The permanent easements <br />have to be filed at the County and require the Mayor's signature. <br />Mayor Linke stated that he had received a call from a resident of <br />Long Lake Road who stated he had received a letter from Evergreen Land <br />Services stating that the project was being delayed until July 1. <br />Mayor Linke stated that this letter was in error and the start date <br />of the project has always been July 1. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to authorize the Director of Public <br />Works to sign temporary easements for Long Lake Road reconstruction <br />on behalf of the City of Mounds View <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />8. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-247C <br />regarding consideration of Resolution No. 4224 Urging Minnesota <br />Congressional Support for Cable Legislation Providing Consumer <br />Protection for Cable Television Subscribers. Orduno stated that the <br />North Suburban Cable Commission has requested that all cities in the <br />North Central Cable Television service area adopt a resolution urging <br />the Minnesota Congressional delegation to support legislation providing <br />consumer protection for subscribers. The North Suburban Cable <br />Commission's concerns are abuse by monopoly service providers, <br />protection of community television and protection of the consumer from <br />abuse by the monopoly service providers. <br />