My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-04-2014
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
06-04-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 7:17:11 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 7:09:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/4/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 2014 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />applied for that a second curb cut is not allowed. The Jensen’s have requested a variance to <br />allow the second curb cut. <br /> <br />Frands Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, commented that when he purchased the property, he was <br />instructed by his realtor to apply for a variance for the second curb cut given the fact Oakwood <br />Drive was not a busy street. <br /> <br />Judith Jensen, 7800 Groveland Road, explained that Oakwood Drive was a very quiet street with <br />few driveways and little traffic. She did not believe that the second curb cut would have a <br />negative impact on the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Schiltgen questioned what was being stored in the garage. <br /> <br />Mrs. Jensen indicated they stored an RV trailer and ATV, and it served as a garden shed. <br /> <br />Mr. Jensen explained that the garage attached to the house was quite small. <br /> <br />Commissioner Birken asked if access could be made from the original curb cut. <br /> <br />Associate Heller commented this was possible, but would create a very long driveway. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Schiltgen inquired the expense of a second curb cut. <br /> <br />Associate Heller did not have a price, but noted it would be the applicant’s responsibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Birken stated this situation arose because the applicant decided to face their <br />garage on Oakwood Drive. Therefore the applicants created this problem and she could not <br />support the variance request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Elofson questioned if there were other corner lots in the City with two curb cuts. <br /> <br />Associate Heller noted there were a few that have been grandfathered in, but some have been <br />removed when the streets were reconstructed. She estimated that there were less than 20 corner <br />lots with two curb cuts in the City. She indicated the Public Works Department did not <br />recommend lots be allowed to have two curb cuts. <br /> <br />Commissioner Elofson did not see the harm in this property having two curb cuts. <br /> <br />Commissioner Love believed that it was a disadvantage to this property owner to not have a <br />second curb cut given the improvements made to this property. She commented that it could be <br />a traffic hazard as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Birken asked why the additional garage space was not added onto the existing <br />garage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.