My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-2013
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
03-20-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 7:33:04 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 7:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/20/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 5A <br />Meeting Date: March 20, 2013 <br />Type of Business: Public Hearing <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to allow a 2nd Driveway to Remain <br />at 7900 Greenfield Avenue; Planning Case VR2013-001 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The applicants, Colvert and Theresa People, property owners of 7900 Greenfield Avenue <br />are requesting a variance to be able to keep a second driveway that has existed since <br />1994. The City Code allows R-1,single family, zoned properties to only have one curb <br />cut/driveway without a variance. The applicants are applying for the variance now because <br />Hillview Road will be reconstructed this year and they didn’t want to lose their second <br />driveway. The City is attempting to bring driveway curb cuts into compliance as much as <br />possible during the street reconstruction projects. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />7900 Greenfield Avenue is a corner lot with a detached garage and driveway, and a <br />second driveway and curb cut. Both driveways access Hillview Road. In 1994, the former <br />owners applied for a variance in order to construct a second driveway that lead up to the <br />back of the house because of health and mobility difficulties. The detached garage is a <br />distance away from the house which is why the second driveway was wanted. The <br />Planning Commission approved the variance with the condition that this second driveway <br />be removed 10 years after the variance approval or upon the sale of the property. It is now <br />almost 19 years later, the house was sold to the applicants in 2002, and the second <br />driveway still exists. The applicants were not told of these conditions when they purchased <br />the house, and one of the selling points for them was this second driveway because <br />Theresa also has mobility difficulties. <br /> <br />The Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission may issue a variance to provide <br />relief to the landowner in those cases where the Code imposes practical difficulties to the <br />property owner in the use of the property owner’s land. This is true for all variance <br />requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria <br />for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria <br />are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. A variance may be <br />granted only in the event that all of the following circumstances exist: <br /> <br />a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these <br />regulations. <br /> <br />The City Code limits the amount of curb cuts and driveways for aesthetics and for <br />safety by having less vehicle entry points onto a street.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.