Laserfiche WebLink
Model Sustainable Development Ordinances 1 <br />Solar Energy Standards <br />INTRODUCTION <br />In spite of its cold and dark reputation, Minnesota has good solar potential, as good as Houston, Texas and <br />many parts of Florida. As solar energy system components have become more efficient and less costly an <br />increasing number of solar energy installations have been installed in Minnesota. Since 2005, the interest in <br />solar energy has rapidly increased such that many communities have had to address solar installations as a land <br />use issue. Solar energy components continue to improve in efficiency and decline in price; the U.S. Department <br />of Energy forecasts that solar energy will start to reach cost parity with retail electric costs by 2016. <br />But solar energy is much more than an alternative (or supplement) to utility power. Solar energy has become a <br />symbol of energy self-sufficiency and environmental sustainability. The growth in solar installations is attribut- <br />able more to the non-economic benefits than as an economic substitute for the electric utility. Households and <br />businesses wanting to reduce their carbon footprint see solar energy as a strong complement to energy effi- <br />ciency. Volatility in natural gas prices makes free solar fuel look attractive as a price hedge. <br />Solar energy issues <br />Local governments will need to address solar energy installations in their development regulation in the near <br />future. Three primary issues tie solar energy to development regulations: <br />1) Climate protection goals. Local governments that have committed to meeting climate protection goals can meet <br />some of their commitment by removing regulatory barriers to solar energy and incorporating low or no-cost <br />incentives in development regulations to spur solar investment. <br />2) Nuisance and safety considerations. Solar energy systems have few nuisances, but visual impacts and safety <br />concerns by neighbors sometimes create opposition to solar installations. Good design and attention to <br />aesthetics can answer most concerns. But the misperception that solar energy systems are ugly and unsafe, <br />rooted in poorly designed 1970s solar installations, have resulted in unnecessary regulation or outright <br />prohibitions. <br />3) Solar access considerations. In fully built-out communities and large lot suburban or exurban areas, solar access <br />is of limited concern. Solar access is, however, an important consideration in zoning districts that allow tall <br />buildings or in developing communities where subdivisions should incorporate solar access provisions. <br />Model Solar Energy Standards <br />This ordinance is based primarily on the model <br />solar energy ordinance created for Solar Min- <br />nesota, under a Million Solar Roofs grant from <br />the U.S. Department of Energy. It has been <br />updated several times to reflect different needs of <br />Minnsota communities and the evolving solar <br />industry, last updated Feburary, 2013