My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
Council Minutes 1992
>
July
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2007 1:06:21 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 1:06:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />regular Meeting <br />Page Four <br />July 13, 1992 <br />Peter Sabee stated that the key issues had to do with location of wetland <br />boundary, criteria for setbacks, lot width and lot area. Mr. Sabee <br />explained the change in wetland boundary and how it was derived. Mr. Sabee <br />also stated that the lot size and area are in compliance. Lot area came in <br />to compliance by widening lots and bringing the lot lines further into the <br />wetland. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked what had changed in the wetland boundary. <br />Mr. Sabee stated that basically the change was the method used to delineate <br />the wetland boundary. <br />Mr. Sabee explained that another concern was the method used for calculating <br />water quality enhancement. Many communities use the Walker method. This <br />method works by providing storm water storage to settle sediment particles <br />from storm water runoff. The more particles settled greater value of water <br />quality. Wildlife enhancement initial concerns are the shape and topography <br />of the ponds. Irregular sides and irregular bottom contours of ponds are <br />better. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked if on this proposal there were fewer lots, but <br />greater proposed development area. <br />Mr. Sabee responded that there was probably more square footage in lots. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked about a ditch in the proposal. Mr. Roos <br />described the location of the ditch, where it ran and the location of the <br />ponds. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked what the effects on the flood plain would be <br />when one is preventing the lowering of the ground water level. <br />Mr. Roos stated that there would be no effect on water flow characteristics. <br />Councilmember Wuori asked if this development was changing the 100' setback <br />on the south and east sides. Are the setbacks the same as before or do they <br />extend further. <br />Mr. Roos stated that the south side doesn't change. on the east there will <br />be a change in the wetland zone at the south one third. There will be less <br />on the west side. Homes on the east side encroach further on the wetland <br />zone than before . <br />Paul Harrington, City Planner stated that houses that are currently in place <br />will remain as they are. <br />Councilmember Wuori also stated that it was her understanding that the <br />persons purchasing this property are purchasing a portion of wetland that <br />cannot be used and could not be maintained as a garden or part of their <br />~ard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.