Laserfiche WebLink
2917 County Rd H2 CUP & VR Request <br />August 7, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />The applicant wants to expand the existing garage by adding 10 feet to the rear for a <br />workshop. The expansion would not change the appearance of the garage from the front. <br /> <br />CUP Considerations: <br /> <br />Chapter 1125 of the Zoning Code requires that the Planning Commission review and <br />address any potential adverse effects of a conditional use that include, but are not limited to, <br />the relationship with the Comprehensive Plan, geographical area involved, potential <br />depreciation, the character of the surrounding area and the demonstrated need for such a <br />use. Staff has addressed each of these potential adverse effects below. <br /> <br />Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates this <br />property as low-density residential, as well as the surrounding area. The Comp Plan <br />encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas to improve the quality, <br />appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. W ith this <br />project, the applicant would be creating a garage workshop. <br /> <br />The Geographical Area Involved. The applicant’s home is located on a large lot in a <br />residential area on County Road H2. <br /> <br />Depreciation. The proposed garage expansion would benefit the subject property both in a <br />practical sense by providing additional indoor storage and workspace, as well as in an <br />economic sense, as the addition would increase the “value” of the property. Increased property <br />values are a benefit to everyone. <br /> <br />The Character of the Surrounding Area. The applicant’s neighborhood is entirely single-family <br />residential. The homes in this area are a variety of styles and ages, but the immediate area <br />properties all have large lots. The garage expansion would be into the backyard and not <br />change the look of the front of the garage. This is a larger property at 106 feet wide and 375 <br />feet deep (0.89 acres), so the total accessory building coverage will only be about 5% of the <br />backyard area. The expansion of 10 more feet to the rear of the existing garage will not be <br />very noticeable. The adjacent property also has a 1,152 square foot oversize garage. <br /> <br />The Demonstrated Need for Such a Use. The applicant is proposing to expand his existing <br />garage into a 1,140 square foot garage by adding a 10 foot addition in the rear to create a <br />workshop. Both the applicant and his wife have hobbies that require a lot of storage space. <br /> <br />Variance Discusssion <br /> <br />The applicant built the existing garage in 1993, and the 21 foot height met the Zoning Code <br />at the time. The Code has since been amended and the maximum height for accessory <br />buildings was changed to 18 feet. The applicant has requested a variance so the height of <br />the expanded garage area can be the same as the existing garage, rather than the back 10 <br />feet being a different height. The access to the second floor storage area is on the exterior <br />rear of the garage, and the doorway would have to be much smaller if the roof was three feet <br />shorter.