My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-2013
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
09-18-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 7:34:50 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 7:29:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5048 Greenwood Variance Report <br />September 18, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan supports improvements to properties. The applicant, owning a <br />corner lot, is at a disadvantage to improve the property as other homeowners might <br />because the property has two front yards. Every property owner has the right to apply for <br />a variance to improve the function and livability of their property. <br /> <br />c. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br />this Title or the City Code. <br /> <br />The applicant cannot control the fact that his property is a corner lot with two front <br />setbacks. The corner lots are much more restricted by the City Code and many times <br />the resident’s use and privacy of the property is limited because of these restrictions. <br /> <br />d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in <br />the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other <br />circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title <br />has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in <br />that most property owners do not have to work with these setback constraints. The City <br />has approved similar variances for taller fences in front yard areas of corner lots that are <br />along busier streets. When the applicant’s house was built, the builder placed it close to <br />the north end of the property in order to give more separation from County Road H. The <br />house has a 15 foot side setback on the north side and approximately a 65 foot setback <br />from the south property line. A big portion of this home’s backyard is considered the <br />front yard according to the City Code. <br /> <br />e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The proposed fence will be setback about 16 feet from the edge of the County Road H <br />pavement so it should not impact sight lines, include the view for vehicles going south <br />from Greenwood Drive and turning onto County Road H. There are other homes along <br />County Road H that have been granted variances for 6-foot tall fences in their front yards <br />due to how busy this road is. <br /> <br />f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical <br />difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties. <br /> <br />The two foot variance is the minimum variance needed since the Zoning Code limits front <br />yard fence heights to four feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.