My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-2013
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
10-02-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 7:34:59 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 7:30:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/2/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Item No: 6A <br />Meeting Date: October 2, 2013 <br />Type of Business: Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Sign Code Amendment Discussion <br /> <br /> <br />The corridor is the City Council’s priority this year and the Planning Commission has been <br />asked to review the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate <br />development along County Road 10. <br /> <br />The Commission has started by focusing on creating a PUD Corridor Overlay District and <br />discussing general development ideas to make the Corridor look better. One of those <br />ideas was changing the style and height allowances of the signage that is along the <br />Corridor to only allow monument style signs, and to reduce the 15 foot setback amount. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed sign code changes at the July 24, 2013 and August 21, 2013 <br />meetings and feels that amending the sign code (Chapter 1008) rather than only having <br />specific requirements for the corridor is a better option. The majority of the commercial <br />signage is along the corridor so it makes more sense to have the sign code be consistent <br />for the whole City. <br /> <br />The proposed added changes are underline and highlighted in blue, and deleted <br />language is stricken and highlighted in red. There is already language for nonconforming <br />signs, which are signs that don’t meet the City Code after it’s amended. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Review the proposed sign code amendments. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br /> <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. Chapter 1008, Signs and Billboards with proposed amendments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.