Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Resolution 995-13 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing regarding this <br />request on November 6, 2013; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all <br />must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds <br />that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal <br />Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property <br />located at 2832 County Road 10, and makes the following findings of fact related to its <br />decision: <br /> <br />1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding setbacks is to create physical <br />separation between buildings and parking areas for aesthetics and a sense of privacy <br />for the property owners. The requested reduced setbacks are very similar to what has <br />existed for many years on this property. <br /> <br />2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is <br />improving the property. <br /> <br />3. The applicant is requesting this variance because of the way the building is sitting on <br />the property and the lack of access which forces this property to share adjoining <br />properties access drives. <br /> <br />4. The unique feature of this property is that the north property line is angled, the building <br />does not sit parallel to County Road 10 and is located closer to the front of the lot, <br />making the front parking lot very small and difficult to maneuver through. The building <br />does not have its own access to County Road 10 and must use the adjoining <br />properties’ access driveways. The building has side setbacks of about 14 feet (west <br />side) and 32 feet (east side), which leave limited room to access the rear parking lot. <br /> <br />5. The new parking lot will have similar or larger setbacks than the previous parking lot <br />did, so there will be no change to the existing character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />6. The variances requested are the minimum variance required to alleviate the applicant’s <br />practical difficulty since that is what the zoning code requires for parking lot setbacks. <br /> <br />7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be <br />necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance <br />upon other properties in the neighborhood. <br />