Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 5B <br />Meeting Date: November 6, 2013 <br />Type of Business: Public Hearing <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Variance Request to allow Reduced Front Yard Setback at 5420 <br />Adams Street; Planning Case VR2013-007 <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />The property owner, Flint Homes, represented by Justin and Marina Flint, are requesting a variance <br />to permit an addition to their house at 5420 Adams Street to encroach eight feet into the prevailing <br />40-foot front yard setback. The Flints want to build a 10’ wide x 8’ deep entry on the front of their <br />house in order to install an interior staircase. The City Code requires houses and garages to have <br />a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet or the prevailing setback on the block, which is 40-feet on <br />the Adams Street block. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />5420 Adams Street was originally a 768 square foot, one-story house with no basement, built in <br />1949. In 2006, the previous property owners raised the house and installed a daylight basement <br />(partially below grade), but did not build stairs inside the house. The only way to access the <br />basement is through an exterior door on the back of the house, and access to the upstairs is from <br />decks on the front and rear of the home that are approximately 7 feet off the ground. The <br />remodeling was never completed and the house was eventually vacated. The house was recently <br />purchased by Flint Homes, who will be finishing the construction started by the previous owners <br />several years ago. <br /> <br />The Flints want to add a small entry to the front of the home that is 10 feet wide by 8 feet deep in <br />order to lower the front door several feet, and to make space inside the house to add a staircase (it <br />would become a “split-entry” style house). This entry would be the about the same size as the deck <br />that is currently on the front of the house. <br /> <br />Variance Criteria Review: <br />As with any variance application, for the Planning Commission to act favorably, there must be a <br />demonstrated practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of <br />the Code overly burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the <br />governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in <br />accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the <br />City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The <br />individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: <br /> <br />a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations. <br /> <br /> The zoning code requires minimum building setbacks for aesthetics and to provide <br />separation and some sense of privacy between neighbors. Front minimum setbacks also <br />create symmetry along the streetscape when all the homes are setback the same. The