Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 5A <br />Meeting Date: April 18, 2012 <br />Type of Business: Public Hearing <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br /> Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a Variance to allow a Detached Accessory <br />Building to Exceed the Maximum Height Limit at 8027 Woodlawn <br />Drive; Planning Case VR11-008 <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />The Planning Commission denied this request in December 2011 and the City Council also <br />denied the variance in March 2012. Since then, the Council rescinded their denial and asked <br />that the Planning Commission review this variance request again under different zoning code <br />requirements. Given that the building permit for the garage has been “open” since it was <br />issued in 2007, City Staff and the City Council have decided that the applicant should use the <br />Zoning Code that was in effect when his permit was issued. The applicant, Tim Downing, <br />property owner of 8027 Woodlawn Drive, is requesting a variance to allow the height of his <br />detached accessory building to exceed the maximum height limit of 15 feet as measured at the <br />midpoint between the eave and the peak (Zoning Code in effect in 2007). Mr. Downing has <br />built a second garage on his property that is 15 feet 9 inches tall at the midpoint. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />In October 2007, the applicant was issued a building permit to construct a detached accessory <br />building on his property. The building plans submitted were for a typical style, single story, 936 <br />square foot detached garage. At the time the permit was issued, the Zoning Code height limit <br />was 15 feet as measured midway between the peak and the eave. Mr. Downing’s garage <br />plans showed a height of 15 feet at the midway point, which met the current zoning code. <br /> <br />Mr. Downing did not start work on the garage for a long time, and the City Building Official <br />granted several extensions for his building permit in order to keep the permit “active” until he <br />had time to start construction. Per the building code, a building permit will stay active as long <br />as some construction work is being done at least every 6 months. The applicant may submit a <br />written request for an extension of their permit, which the Building Official may grant at their <br />discretion. <br /> <br />A footing inspection for the garage was finally done by the City building inspector on August <br />31, 2010, and the floor slab was poured the next week. After that, the City did not receive any <br />requests from Mr. Downing for more inspections. In late August 2011, Staff became aware <br />that a 2-story garage with dormers had been constructed on the applicant’s property. After <br />reviewing the permit application, staff saw that the garage Mr. Downing built was different from <br />the plans he had submitted in 2007. The Building Official attempted to contact Mr. Downing in <br />late August 2011, and again in September after receiving no response to the first letter. <br />