My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-03-2012
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
10-03-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 7:46:23 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 7:43:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/3/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Mounds View TIF Distric t No. 3 Modification 9 | P a g e <br /> <br />districts will have over 99% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax <br />base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate estimate in 1988 levied by <br />each taxing jurisdiction to the project3ed mill rate and the estimated tax increment received <br />reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below <br />ASSUMING DEVELOPMENT WOULD OCCUR WITHOUT PUBLIC ASSISTANCE. <br /> The finance plan indicates an anticipated tax increment at build out as follows: <br /> <br /> Captured <br />Assessed <br />Valuation <br />Tax Increment <br />Received <br />Tax Increment Finance District #3 $5,068,376 $593,000 <br /> <br /> Based on an estimated mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows <br />for the taxing bodies: <br /> <br /> Mills Percent Tax Increment <br />City 16.742 14.3 84,799 <br />County 33.730 28.8 170,784 <br />School District 59.076 50.5 299,465 <br />Other 7.378 6.4 37,952 <br />Total 116.926 100.00 593,000 <br /> <br />The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to <br />compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing <br />jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax <br />increment district would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it <br />not for public intervention by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due <br />to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the <br />duration of the tax increment financing district, this new assessed value could <br />eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured <br />assessed value was available for each taxing jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax <br />dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is <br />facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax <br />increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same amount of <br />tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects <br />occurred WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF THE CITY. <br /> <br /> Adjusted* Assessed <br />Value <br />Required <br />Mills <br />Without F.D. <br />Contribution <br />School District $604,464,784 .495 299,465 <br />County $3,315,182,299 .052 170,784 <br />City $59,177,551 1.432 84,799 <br /> <br /> *Tax Increment District assessed valuation subtracted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.