Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission October 3, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if the neighbors were in favor with this recommendation. <br /> <br />Mrs. Mahlum commented this was not an ideal situation and perhaps a different home design <br />would resolve the situation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit indicated the extension of the retaining wall would assure that cars were <br />not driving into the neighbor’s fence. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson suggested the existing retaining wall remain, but that it not be required the <br />entire length of the driveway to the garage. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Cramblit/Commissioner Miller. To approve Resolution <br />972-12, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance allowing for a Three Foot <br />Driveway Setback; Planning Case No. VR2012-005. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />A. Modification to the Project Plan for the Mounds View Economic <br />Development Project and TIF Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3 <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the City is modifying the Mounds <br />View Economic Development Project and TIF Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, in order to identify <br />parcels that the City would like to acquire through the use of tax increment generated from these <br />districts for redevelopment. The City has created a list of potential redevelopment properties <br />which was discussed in detail with the Commission. It was noted the expansion of this list <br />would provide for greater flexibility for redevelopment in the future. Staff recommended <br />approval of the proposed modifications. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked how many more properties were added to the newly revised list. <br /> <br />Associate Heller estimated that an additional 250 properties were added to the new list. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause questioned how many properties were removed from the list. <br /> <br />Associate Heller explained that through development and demolition of some properties, <br />approximately one-third of the properties on the original list were removed. She noted some of <br />the properties were vacant or landlocked. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson was thanked staff for spending time to review each property in the City. <br />