Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 21, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Planning Cases <br /> <br />A. VR2011-007 Consideration of a Variance Request to Allow a Second Curb <br />Cut and Driveway in an R-1, Single Family Residential District at 6939 <br />Pleasant View Drive <br /> <br />Associate Planner Heller indicated the Planning Commission is being asked to consider a <br />variance request to allow a second curb cut and driveway at 6939 Pleasant View Drive. Staff <br />indicated the lot was 100 feet wide and 450 feet deep. The existing home was built in 1940, and <br />was placed approximately 15 feet from the south property line. City Code allows one curb cut <br />on each R-1, Single Family Residential zoned property without a variance. <br /> <br />Associate Heller explained the property has had two driveways since 1993 when the old garage <br />was removed and a new two-car garage was built on the other side of the house, ten feet from the <br />north property line. A second driveway leading to the new garage was added. The street had no <br />curbs at the time, so the Lestinas continued to use both driveways until 2010 when Pleasant <br />View Drive was reconstructed and curbs were added. <br /> <br />Associate Heller stated in early 2010, in preparation for the street project, the Public Works <br />Department mailed Ms. Lestina a letter stating that her property had two driveways, and that she <br />must contact the City if she wants to keep the second curb cut. Ms. Lestina did not contact the <br />City before the street was reconstructed, and as a result, only one curb cut was installed on the <br />driveway that leads to the garage, and access to the south driveway was lost. <br /> <br />Associate Heller noted Ms. Lestina has now applied for a variance because she wants to be able <br />to use the south driveway again. This driveway leads right up to the house, and she has physical <br />limitations that make it difficult for her to get around. City Staff has informed Ms. Lestina that if <br />the Planning Commission were to approve a variance for a second curb cut, she would have one- <br />year to install a hard surface driveway and new curb cut that meets the required five-foot <br />setback. Staff was available for comments from the Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schiltgen asked what action the applicant took in 2010 to keep the second curb <br />cut. <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Lestina indicated he attended the City street project meeting in the spring of 2010. He <br />filled out an application to keep the second curb cut and it was not accepted. His family got busy