Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 5A <br />Meeting Date: October 5, 2011 <br />Type of Business: Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br />To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br />From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of the Minor Subdivision of 7337 Spring <br />Lake Road; Planning Case MI2011-001 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />The Voltin Family, represented by Gary Voltin and Bonnie Hagel, are the property owners of <br />7337 Spring Lake Road. Their parents, Edmund and Helen Voltin, bought this property in <br />1948. Both Edmund and Helen are now deceased, and Gary and Bonnie are the court <br />appointed personal representatives for the estate. They are requesting city approval of a <br />minor subdivision to split the property into two lots. <br /> <br />The proposed subdivision will create a north lot that will have the original house on it, and a <br />south lot that is vacant. The applicants have submitted a Certificate of Survey that shows the <br />proposed new lots. <br />Discussion: <br />A minor subdivision is ordinarily a division of land less than two acres in area in which no more <br />than one additional lot is created. <br /> <br />The lot is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and the Comprehensive Plan designates this <br />area for low density residential. The minimum lot width for interior residential parcels is 75 <br />feet and the minimum lot area is 11,000 square feet, and corner lots must be a minimum of <br />100 feet wide and 12,500 square feet. Below is a table which shows the dimensions for the <br />parcels before and as a result of the proposed adjustment: <br /> <br /> Before <br />Area Sq. Feet / Lot Dimension <br />After <br />Area Sq. feet / Lot Dimension <br />7337 Spring Lake <br />Road <br />28,471 square feet <br />265’ x 107’ <br />11,008 square feet <br />102.5’ x 107.4 <br />New Vacant lot N/A 17,462 square feet <br />162.6’ x 107.4’ <br /> <br />As this table shows, the proposed lots will meet or exceed all city standards. <br /> <br />The new vacant lot will probably be purchased with the intention of the owners building a <br />new house. The City Code setback requirements could pose a challenge when building a <br />new house on this lot. Because of the larger front “prevailing” setbacks on both County <br />Road H2 and Spring Lake Road, a new house would have to be placed in the northeast <br />corner of the lot, but still meet a 30-foot rear setback. These setback requirements will put <br />some limits on the size and orientation of a new house. There is an option for the owners <br />to apply for a variance to allow reduced setbacks, but it does appear there still are many <br />options for house styles that could be built on the lot without a variance. This lot will have <br />most of its lawn space in the front and side yards, rather than behind the house.