My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-07-2011
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
12-07-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 8:40:56 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 8:38:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/7/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Downing Garage Height Variance Report <br />December 7, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />The Zoning Code states that the Planning Commission may issue a variance to provide <br />relief to the landowner in those cases where the Code imposes practical difficulties to the <br />property owner in the use of the property owner’s land. This is true for all variance <br />requests. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria <br />for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria <br />are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. A variance may be <br />granted only in the event that all of the following circumstances exist: <br /> <br />a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these <br />regulations. <br /> <br />The zoning code limits the height of buildings in order to maintain visual consistency <br />throughout neighborhoods. Accessory buildings in particular have these limitations <br />so they do not exceed the height of the house, and to limit the uses that could occur <br />in a larger building. This garage is not taller than the house, and will provide more <br />indoor storage for the applicant. <br /> <br />b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />While the Comprehensive Plan does not specify design or size criteria for buildings, <br />it does support improvements to and the maintenance of properties. One might say <br />that the applicant has built a “better than standard” looking garage because of the <br />added design features of windows and dormers. <br /> <br />c. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br />this Title or the City Code. <br /> <br />The applicant owns many things that would be stored in a large garage. <br /> <br />d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in <br />the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other <br />circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title <br />has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />This property does not have any unique features other than it is a larger lot. <br /> <br />e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The applicant’s neighborhood consists of large, almost one acre size lots, and the <br />applicant has a 2-story house, so the height of the garage is compatible with the <br />house, and the overall garage size does not feel overwhelming to the property or the <br />neighborhood. The second garage is behind the front line of both adjacent neighbor’s <br />home and garage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.