Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 19, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Planning Cases <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />A. Review Code Amendment - Accessory Building <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated staff has been working on language for the accessory building <br />code amendment. She indicated the proposed language now has the maximum height at 18 feet. <br />She indicated that the City Council had concerns regarding the proposed 20-foot garage height <br />language, and staff has added additional language in Section 5 that states the structure should <br />match or be similar to the character and style of the roof of the principal structure and have a <br />pitch of at least 2-12. She added there is additional language in Section 4 to specify materials <br />that are not allowed on the exterior of an accessory building. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson questioned the additional language in Section 5 and the implication that <br />accessory buildings less than 250 square feet can have a flat roof. He felt this wasn’t the <br />appropriate section to have the 250 square foot limitation. He added that he had concerns <br />regarding the pitch specification and the problems with flat roofs in the Minnesota winter <br />climate. He suggested moving this specification to a different section of the code. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller suggested moving the language regarding the pitch of the roof into <br />Section 3. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned language in Section 4g regarding canvas and why <br />it is repeated in materials not allowed, and then would be allowed for green houses. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit stated the intent of the green house specification is that other materials <br />are typically used for them. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller suggested removing the word “on” in the sentence “except for on <br />green houses.” <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated that by removing the reference to green houses, it implies the city doesn’t <br />allow them. In building a green house, you typically use other materials. <br />