Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 5B <br />Meeting Date: June 18, 2008 <br />Type of Business: Commission Business <br /> <br /> <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> To: Mounds View Planning Commission <br /> From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate <br />Item Title/Subject: Final Approval of an Administrative Variance for a <br />Reduced Driveway Setback at 5053 Brighton Lane; <br />Planning Case AV2008-002 <br /> <br />The applicant, John Wiggins, is proposing to replace his gravel driveway with asphalt. <br />The driveway currently winds around two large trees that are in the way of where the <br />driveway normally would be. The applicant’s garage was built right behind a tree, and <br />another tree is closer to the street. These trees cause the driveway to be different <br />widths and make the garage partially inaccessible for vehicles. The applicant would like <br />to put the new asphalt driveway in the same place that the gravel currently exists, which <br />has a two foot setback between the trees, and more than a five foot setback on the <br />other sides of the trees. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Staff reviewed this request and determined that it qualified for an administrative <br />variance, as it is a pre-existing, non-conforming driveway. Administrative Variances <br />were added as an option a few years ago to make the process faster and easier for <br />residents when their request was not excessively beyond what the code allows. Staff <br />reviewed the proposed driveway replacement and spoke with the applicant about his <br />hardship claim. <br /> <br />Staff feels that the situation is sufficient to warrant a variance. Staff also considered any <br />negative affects that the proposed addition might have on the surrounding area and <br />found that the driveway replacement would not negatively impact the neighborhood as <br />the width would be remaining the same. The Community Development Director granted <br />preliminary approval. The five adjacent property owners have been notified of the <br />variance request. At the time this report was written, Staff had received no feedback <br />from the adjacent property owners. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />