Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Senior Housing Code Amendments <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />With the issues and concerns noted above, staff has prepared the following list of <br />topics for the Planning Commission to discuss: <br /> <br />1. Define “Senior Housing” – should there be an age limit for who is allowed to live there? <br />Ages 55 or 62 are commonly used, or if a couple, at least one member must be at least <br />62. <br /> <br />2. Unit sizes – the city code currently states that a 1 bedroom unit must be at least 630 <br />square feet, and a 2 bedroom unit must be at least 750 square feet. These sizes are <br />much larger than what is being proposed for new senior housing projects that include <br />assisted living, and the city code does not address “studio” or “efficiency” apartments at <br />all, which are commonly used in assisted living facilities. <br /> <br />3. Density – the city code regulates density by requiring a minimum lot area per dwelling <br />unit. For example; multiple family requires 2,500 square feet of land per unit, a <br />townhouse requires 6,500 square feet of land per unit, and single family detached <br />requires 11,000 square feet of land for interior lots and 12,500 square feet of land for <br />corner lots. This requirement for regular multiple family is realistic when you factor in <br />800-1,000 square foot units, 2.5 stalls per unit of parking and garages. This becomes an <br />issue when many senior housing units are less than 500 square feet, which means there <br />are a lot more units in a building. Density is one of the primary issues that other cities are <br />addressing when updating their city codes about senior housing. <br /> <br />4. Parking – current city code requires multi family housing to provide 2.5 parking spaces <br />per unit, with at least one of the spaces enclosed. The R-4 zoning district code does <br />have parking requirements for nursing homes and other senior congregate living, but it <br />does not seem to be appropriate for senior independent living as it only requires 1 space <br />for every 3 beds, plus 1 stall per employee on the largest shift. Many will agree that <br />congregate senior housing does not need nearly as much parking as a normal multi <br />family development. Most cities are reducing the parking requirements for senior housing <br />developments. <br /> <br />5. Ensuring that the building remains senior housing - If the buildings are designed to be <br />different from a typical multi-family housing building, and/or the city lowers requirements <br />for things such as parking, unit sizes, etc., should there be some guarantee that the <br />buildings will only be used for senior housing? <br /> <br />6. Develop all senior housing projects as a Planned Unit Development (PUD)? – this is an <br />option that could be used rather than changing several areas of the city code. The last <br />two senior housing developments in Mounds View(Real Life Co-op and Silver Lake <br />Pointe) are both zoned PUD. The city code currently requires that all PUD residential <br />developments must be at least a three acre site, but the code could be amended to allow <br />all senior housing developments to be a PUD regardless of property size. Because of the <br />site size requirement, the current code limits the developments that could use a PUD. <br />The new senior housing project is only a 2.38 acre parcel so we are not able to take <br />advantage of the flexibility that a PUD allows. <br />