My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-03-2008
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
09-03-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:23:21 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:17:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/3/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mermaid Staff Report <br />September 3, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />There also are other issues to keep in mind when determining whether the parking would be <br />adequate for the new retail use. The Mermaid sets up a 4,200 square foot temporary tent for <br />180 days each spring through fall as additional banquet space. When the City approved the <br />Interim Use Permit for the tent in March 2005, it was determined that the existing parking <br />available on the site was adequate. This IUP was only approved for five years, which means <br />that they will need to reapply for another IUP in March 2010. The consultant who did the <br />parking study included the temporary tent (called the “courtyard”) into the parking <br />requirements, whereas the City approved the IUP without requiring any additional parking. <br /> <br />Another issue is that the Mermaid is currently leasing a number of their parking spaces near <br />County Highway 10 to Metro Transit for a Park & Ride. The parking study does not address <br />this as an existing use, so one could assume that the Mermaid will be discontinuing the <br />leasing agreement if the city approves the subdivision and PUD Amendment. <br /> <br />In 2000, when the PUD was approved for the hotel addition, the PUD Agreement stated that <br />808 parking stalls were required for the site. There are currently 760 stalls existing on the <br />Mermaid site. The proposed 1.4 acre lot would remove 193 stalls from the Mermaid’s <br />property, but the new retail construction would add 87 stalls back. This would equal a total of <br />654 parking stalls on both the Mermaid and new retail center property. The developer is <br />proposing to share parking with the Mermaid, and is using 87 of the Mermaid’s remaining 567 <br />stalls as shared parking in order to meet the retail center’s 174 parking stall requirement. <br /> <br />The parking demands for this entire site, including the new development, will vary throughout <br />each day. All of the uses on the site will not have their peak parking demands at the same <br />time or even on the same day of the week. The Mermaid is currently 48 parking stalls short <br />of what was required in 2000, and also has been able to lease unused daytime spaces for <br />Park & Ride parking, and yet the owners state that the parking lot has still never been filled to <br />anywhere near capacity. <br /> <br />Amendment Process: <br /> <br />An amendment to a Planned Unit Development is processed as an amendment to an <br />approved Conditional Use Permit. That means that the City follows the procedural <br />requirements of Section 1125 of the Zoning Code. Section 1125 requires that the Planning <br />Commission and City Council review the request, taking into consideration any and all <br />potential adverse effects of the proposed amendment. <br /> <br />Relationship to Comprehensive Plan. Mounds View’s adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies <br />the Mermaid property PUD site as a Regional Commercial PUD. The proposed accessory <br />building as an addition to the existing office building would be consistent with the Comp Plan. <br /> <br />The geographical area involved. The new parcel would be right at the corner of County Highway <br />10 and County Road H, with the Mermaid adjacent to the north and west. <br /> <br />Neighborhood Impact. The neighborhood should not be impacted by adding a new retail <br />building. This area of the city is not near any residential and there is a traffic signal at this <br />intersection.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.