My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
03-21-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 9:47:26 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:28:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/21/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission March 7, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated that for the Commission to support the requested rezoning, it <br />must find that the request would not be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would not <br />cause or create adverse impacts to the surrounding properties. She stated a rezoning request is <br />approved by ordinance with two readings by the City Council with the ordinance taking affect 30 <br />days after the final reading. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated he would like the comprehensive definitions for highway commercial and <br />neighborhood commercial included before it is passed on to Council. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller read the definition of each for the Commission members. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated he sees a problem with that definition because there are two types of gas <br />station and the Commission has only one to work with. He said this is a small community <br />neighborhood gas station, not a highway designated station. He asked if the City could change <br />the code or is this what is designated by the State. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson replied the Planning Commission could recommend <br />a change to the comprehensive plan and the zoning code. He stated the Planning Commission <br />could create the two class gas station system. He stated the zoning code requires gas stations be <br />in a B-3 designation, if the station goes away, the Planning Commission could be looking at <br />whether the property is a true B-3 planned use designation. He suggested if the Planning <br />Commission considered that option, Staff would have to look at the comp plan and see where <br />this type of gas station falls. Director Ericson stated it is a good suggestion as it would guard <br />against a more intense land use coming onto the property at a later date. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek asked how this would be incorporated into this proposal. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson replied it would be a two step process by making the change to the <br />comprehensive plan designation definitions at this point. He mentioned that when the Comp <br />Plan comes out in about two years, this change could be incorporated into the update process. <br />He stated he thinks the Planning Commission could incorporate the definition change. He stated <br />if this property is designated as Highway Commercial, there would be nothing stopping a <br />Holiday gas station or other disruptive commercial entity from building there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek asked if there is information on why the two pumps were <br />taken out. She asked why the City said they could not add them back in. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller replied because it is a nonconforming lot. She explained with <br />nonconforming you can take something away, but could not add to it. She stated The Station <br />must have a 22,500 square foot site in order to become conforming. She explained that with the <br />land purchase, they would now be able to meet that requirement and thus the other requests <br />could now be met also. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Meehlhause, and he were on the <br />Planning Commission when this was brought up before. He stated he remembers the thoughts
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.