Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission December 5, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit questioned what would happen if the redundancies failed. <br /> <br />Mr. Pehrson replied the redundant fail safe design has been proposed on the three above ground <br />tanks and the fill area. He stated this is a new concept with little incident for evaluation. He <br />stated this is a mechanical system designed to react should a hazardous event occur, but still <br />must rely on it’s mechanics to operate properly. He stated it could not assure a zero risk; <br />however, it would bring it down to what the code states to reduce risk. He mentioned a special <br />fire resistant coating that could be applied to the large tanks as well as other options to increase <br />safety. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson pointed out the location of the Townsedge Terrace manufactured home park and <br />asked how much of a concern this is to the Fire Department. <br /> <br />Fire Marshall Osmonson replied the safety of residents is always the primary concern of the Fire <br />Department. She indicated though that she can only enforce the code. <br /> <br />Mr. Pehrson replied standards are established that the tanks must pass. He stated the separation <br />distances are met. He commented that a fire safety analysis is required for the new location. He <br />explained that the release scenarios are not worst case scenarios for testing ultimate safety. Mr. <br />Pehrson stated it would not appear to protect from rocketing tanks or cylinders. He stated that in <br />the past there have been cases where this has been the case; however, the tanks or cylinders <br />traveled less than 1,000 feet. He stated the code did not appear to address this. <br /> <br />Fire Marshall Osmonson stated the code states only the minimums. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated it appears that Ferrellgas it is now closer to the Fedtech building. He <br />commented he appreciated that Ferrellgas chose a location that is lower than the neighboring <br />properties. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walsh-Kaczmarek questioned what would be the difference in the procedures in <br />Mounds View than in the current location for the escaping of odorant. <br /> <br />Mr. Pehrson replied the adopted fire code minimums did not address odor thresholds and <br />traveling distance from a site. He commented that there is one area where, if odor is a concern, <br />low emission transfer may cut down on the odors. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lang asked Fire Marshall Osmonson to elaborate on the additional fire <br />department training requirements that would be needed if Ferrellgas were to move here. <br /> <br />Fire Marshall Osmonson replied Ferrellgas has agreed to provide training to the Fire Department <br />on an annual basis. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cramblit questioned whether the Fire Department had the required equipment to <br />handle an emergency at Ferrellgas. <br />