Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission January 18, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />the only individuals interested want to maintain the property as an independent gas station. <br />There is no guarantee there would be any investment in the property. Director Ericson explained <br />that the condition of the property is likely inhibiting the sale. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if the City would be better off owning the property than waiting for <br />someone to purchase the property as it is. Director Ericson stated that the first priority is to <br />eliminate the blighted buildings from the site, indicating he did not want it to be similar to the <br />Amoco property that sat vacant for 3 to 4 years. He advised that the Council does not want to <br />wait 4 years to see what will happen. Also, if the City controls the property, it can help dictate <br />what goes into that corner, rather than keeping it a gas station, or another drug store or car wash. <br />In addition, there would be the benefit of the resale of the property once it is cleared. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked about the total cleanup with removal of gas tanks and possible <br />contamination. He noted the level of contamination (if any) is not known nor whether the <br />purchase price would be reduced because of that potential. Director Ericson stated that is a good <br />point and explained that those issues would be negotiated into the purchase agreement. He <br />assured the Planning Commission that the City would not want to buy this property unless the <br />City knew if there were spills or contamination. The City would likely conduct a Phase I <br />environmental analysis and, if warranted, a Phase II analysis. Director Ericson stated the City is <br />not aware of any spills on the property and have not been notified by the MPCA of issues on the <br />site. But, given the nature of the present operation, there is certainly that risk. Director Ericson <br />advised that staff would make sure any agreement with the property owner would include a <br />contingency for it being a clean site. If not a clean site, the purchase price would either be <br />adjusted accordingly based on the cost to clean the site or the City would not purchase the site. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked about removal of the gas tanks. Director Ericson stated that would be <br />negotiated as a condition of purchasing the property, that the tanks be removed under MPCA <br />guidelines, whether with Oasis or the property owner. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked about the property on County Road 10 that used to be a gas station <br />where they sell Christmas trees. Director Ericson stated that is not City owned property and is <br />owned by Integra Homes. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson stated clean up on that property was on going, about a three-year project. He <br />commented that almost every gas station vacation has had problems. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause stated that should be the responsibility of the seller and owner, not <br />the buyer. He explained that with the company he works for, they are always responsible for soil <br />contamination issues when they sell a property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Scotch asked if the proposal is for reuse as sushi bar property. Director Ericson <br />explained that the Donut Connection property is being re-purposed as a sushi bar and that <br />renovation is currently underway but he is not sure when it will open. <br />