My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-15-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
02-15-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:15:22 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 9:59:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/15/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 1, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />consistent with special legislation adopted by the 2005 Minnesota Legislature. He stated that the <br />development agreement entered into by and between the Economic Development Authority and <br />Medtronic provided $14.8 million dollars of assistance to Medtronic to construct the first phase <br />of a three phase development which would consist of 1.5 million square feet of office space at <br />full build out. He indicated that the amended agreement would provide for a maximum $22.9 <br />million dollars of assistance. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson advised that Minnesota Statutes require that a city’s <br />planning agency review all modifications to existing TIF Project Plans to determine consistency <br />with the municipality’s Comprehensive Plan. He stated this requirement is similar to the <br />requirement whereby the planning agency reports on the consistency of new TIF Districts with <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that in terms of what the Commission is <br />reviewing, it must make a determination as to whether the modification is consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. He stated that in other words, it’s the development for which the <br />modification is predicated consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He noted that the <br />Comprehensive Plan was amended last year by changing the Future Land Use designation of the <br />Medtronic site to “Office”. He stated this amendment was approved at the same time that a <br />rezoning was approved for the Medtronic CRM development which authorized 1.5 million <br />square feet of office space and other accessory, ancillary uses. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that at the direction of the EDA, Ehler’s and <br />Associates prepared the financial analysis for the project modification, which is attached to the <br />report for the Commission to review. He indicated this document is essentially the same as what <br />the Commission reviewed last year as approved by the EDA on August 22, 2005. He stated that <br />the summary of the changes was to the square footage, and where the Plan said $14.8 million in <br />TIF, it now says $22.9 million. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson noted that $8.1 million in TIF is being added for <br />Phase II, however there may be some adjustments to that figure. He indicated that Medtronic <br />would cover the costs to bring Well #4 back on-line, and relocate some of the billboards. He <br />stated that should the four billboards not be able to be relocated within the city, Medtronic would <br />be on the hook to buy out those leases. He noted that Mounds View does not approve the <br />location of the billboards; that approval is up to Mn/Dot. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that the language changes are bolded, and <br />followed by ‘as modified 2-13-2006’. He reviewed the changes through the document. He <br />noted that the office building has been approved by the city, and the modification is to support <br />Phase II, which has also been approved. He indicated that the work being undertaken on County <br />Road J also would support this project. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson noted that Aaron Backman is here to answer <br />questions, as is Shelley Ehler’s from Ehler’s and Associates. He stated that staff is requesting <br />that the resolution submitted be approved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.