Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission February 15, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn stated he understands this is the easiest route to take and asked whether it <br />should have been caught by the attorney. Director Ericson stated it probably should have. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Miller asked how many businesses could be accommodated. Dr. Belting explained <br />that the building is set up to have a total of three or four additional tenants. If someone buys the <br />two middle units together, then there would be three owners. Otherwise, there will be a total of <br />four owners. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Miller noted there should not be a requirement for a lot of extra parking. Tom <br />Belting stated they don’t anticipate a need for extra parking and pointed out that the building is <br />not directly on County Road 10. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zwirn pointed out that Beltings are operating in good faith and in a situation <br />where they relied on information provided to them. Now, because of an error, they cannot rectify <br />the problem without this process. He stated he supports adoption of the resolution and to allow <br />the project to go forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland asked whether the resolution should be amended to indicate the number <br />of parking spaces. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated the resolution can explicitly state the requirement is 43 stalls and then <br />round up to 1 per 200 feet. He suggested the “Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved” paragraph be <br />amended to indicate: …“one space per 200 square feet of office space (43 stalls)” ratio and <br />recommends approval of said amendment.” <br /> <br />Vice Chair Miller asked staff to place her name on the last page of the resolution for signature. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Meehlhause. To approve amended Resolution 827-06, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of Planned Unit Development Amendment Relating to Parking <br />Requirements for the Walgreens PUD; Planning Case No. PA2005-001. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson informed the Commission that the Council invites the <br />Planning Commission to attend a joint workshop of the Council and Commission on Monday, <br />March 20, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. He explained the Council is holding joint planning sessions with all <br />Boards and Commissions to be sure everyone is on track with the same goals and mission. The <br />City Council would like to get the Planning Commission’s opinion on various issues and is <br />looking at charting the path for economic development into the future. This is one means to seek <br />out the Commission’s opinion. <br />