My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2006
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
04-19-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:15:38 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 10:02:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/19/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Code Review <br />April 19, 2006 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Retaining Wall Definitions <br />Arden Hills Undefined <br />Blaine Undefined <br />Circle Pines Undefined <br />Columbia Heights A wall or structure constructed of stone, concrete, wood, or other materials, <br />used to retain soil, as a slope transition, or edge of a planting area. <br />Coon Rapids Undefined <br />Cottage Grove A structure utilized to hold a slope in a position in which it would not naturally <br />remain. <br />Fridley Undefined <br />New Brighton Undefined <br />Roseville Undefined <br />Shoreview Undefined <br />St. Anthony That which is erected as a permanent barrier, affixed along its entire length <br />to the ground or some immovable structure to impede the movement or <br />erosion of soil. <br />Vadnais Heights Undefined <br /> <br /> <br />As is the case with fences, no definition is articulated in the Mounds View City Code for <br />retaining walls, probably because a retaining wall has a commonly accepted meaning. If <br />such a definition is determined to be an important addition to our Code, staff would suggest <br />something similar to what appears in the Columbia Heights code. Again, probably more <br />important than the definition is whether or not such a structure would be required to be set <br />back from a property line. <br /> <br />Retaining Wall Setbacks <br /> <br />As indicated on page 2 of this report, the one and only reference to a retaining wall in the <br />Mounds View Code is in Section 1103.08, Subd 1, where it addresses grade change or <br />separations, “such as the division of properties by a retaining wall”… which would clearly <br />indicate that retaining walls were anticipated at lot lines similar to fences. Public Works <br />Director Greg Lee provided feedback at a recent City Council meeting that most street projects <br />and sidewalk projects utilize retaining walls as a means to resolve grade changes between the <br />right of way and private property. If a retaining wall had to be set back a distance from a lot <br />line, either the City would have to give up right of way or it would have to acquire permanent <br />easements from the property owners adjacent to the constructed walls. Either way, adopting <br />such a requirement would make nearly every retaining wall in the City used for leveling grades <br />at the property line a non-conforming use. <br /> <br />No permits are required for retaining walls less than two feet in height, as these are typically <br />more for aesthetic appearances or for landscaping improvements than they are for function. <br />Retaining walls from two to four feet require a zoning permit while a retaining wall in excess <br />of four feet requires a building permit and shall be reviewed by the building official. In most <br />cases, such walls are professionally designed with plans bearing the signature of an architect <br />or engineer. General requirements regarding retaining walls could be added as a subdivision <br />under the Fence section of the Code, Section 1103.08.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.