My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2006
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
06-21-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 10:09:03 AM
Creation date
8/30/2018 10:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Clear Channel IUP Report <br />June 21, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />In addition to the adverse effects criteria, the City is to also consider the General Conditional <br />Use Permit criteria found in Section 1125.01 Subd. 3 as part of the consideration: <br /> <br />(1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and <br />other public facilities and utilities that serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> <br />The Installation of a billboard will not create or cause a burden to public facilities. <br /> <br />(2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from <br />adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value <br />and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br /> <br />It is believed that the billboard would not be visible from any residentially zoned property in <br />the City and that the installation of the billboard would not have a detrimental effect on the <br />development of vacant land in the area. <br /> <br />(3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon <br />adjacent residential properties. <br /> <br />There are no residential properties adjacent to the Mermaid and as such this requirement does <br />not necessarily apply. <br /> <br />(4) The use, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, is reasonably related to the overall <br />needs of the City and to the existing land use. <br /> <br />It is assumed that the need for the proposed billboards is reasonably related to the economic <br />situation of the property owner and is reasonably related to the need to relocate four <br />billboards from the former golf course property.. <br /> <br />(5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the <br />zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. <br /> <br />With the adoption of Ordinance 769, the proposed billboard is consistent with the purposes of <br />the City Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which they are to be located. <br /> <br />(6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan does not contemplate or address the issue of billboards. <br /> <br />(7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> <br />Studies commissioned by highway safety and transportation groups and federal agencies find <br />no correlation between billboards and accidents. Even so, it cannot be disputed that the main <br />premise of a billboard is to attract or divert a driver’s attention, if only for a brief moment. <br />Diverting one’s attention from the act of driving could result in an accident. In that respect <br />however, a billboard is no different than any thing else within a driver’s field of vision.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.