Laserfiche WebLink
After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and affected <br />ission can take one of the following actions related to the request: <br /> <br />is <br />attached for approval as is or with amendments. The approval would be contingent upon <br /> <br />2. <br />ropriate to support the <br />denial. <br />3. <br />re discussion is needed, the Commission can simply move to table the request <br />until such information has been provided. The City has submitted their request for an <br /> <br />Re <br /> <br />neighbors, the Comm <br />1. Approve the variance as requested or approve the variance, but amend the reduced <br />setback to an amount that the Commission feels is appropriate. Resolution 848-06 <br />approval of a development review, approval of the drainage plan from the Public Works <br />department, and approval from Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />Deny the requested variance. To move forward with this option, the Commission should <br />direct staff to draft a resolution of approval with findings of fact app <br /> <br />Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered <br />or if mo <br />additional 60 days for this application due to the complexity of the project, but the <br />Commission should still act upon the request as soon as reasonably possible in order to <br />be able to continue moving through all the planning requests associated with this <br />proposal. <br />spectfully submitted, <br /> <br />1. Application <br />2. Information from Applicant <br />ap <br />n <br />8-06 <br /> <br /> <br />Heidi Heller <br />Planning Associate <br /> <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />3. Zoning M <br />4. Aerial Map <br />5. Photographic Documentatio <br />6. Site Plan <br />7. Resolution 84