Laserfiche WebLink
Recommendation: <br />taff has prepared both approval and denial resolutions for the Planning Commission to <br />some <br />Staff has suggested to Mr. Hailey, Tyson’s engineer, that he change the parking spaces <br />er <br />After taking testimony from staff and the applicant, the Commission can take one of the <br />1. Approve the variance as requested or approve an amended variance. Resolution 848-06 <br /> <br />. Deny the requested variance. Resolution 848-06 Option B has been drafted denying the <br /> <br />3 Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />S <br />consider. The Planning Commission can make amendments to the resolutions as they <br />feel is suitable, or the Commission may not feel it is appropriate to approve these <br />variances at all. This proposal is for an extremely large building on a site that has <br />limitations. The Planning Commission should keep in mind that these plans are showing <br />the applicant’s first choice scenario - the largest building that would physically fit on this <br />site and being able to fit the five rail cars they want inside the building. <br /> <br />from parallel parking to angle parking since more spaces would fit in that way. Another <br />suggestion to him was to cut off the northeast corner of the building and continue the <br />angle. Any modification of this suggestion would give this corner of the building a larg <br />setback. <br /> <br />following actions related to the request: <br /> <br /> <br />Option A is attached for approval as is or with amendments. The approval would be <br />contingent upon approval of a development review, approval of the drainage plan from <br />the Public Works department, and approval from Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />2 <br />variance request. <br />. <br />or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can simply move to table the request <br />until such information has been provided. The City has submitted their request for an <br />additional 60 days for this application due to the complexity of the project, but the <br />Commission should still act upon the request as soon as reasonably possible in order to <br />be able to continue moving through all the planning requests associated with this <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Heidi Heller <br />ociate <br />ttachments: <br />on <br />om Applicant <br /> Documentation <br /> 848-06 <br />Planning Ass <br /> <br />A <br />1. Applicati <br />2. Information fr <br />3. Zoning Map <br />4. Aerial Map <br />5. Photographic <br />6. Site Plan <br />7. Resolution