Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 20, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Scotch /Commissioner Hegland, to approve the Minutes of <br />the July 19, 2006 regular Planning Commission meeting with corrections. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> <br />None. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. Planning Cases <br /> <br />A. VR2006-008: Consideration of a Variance for a Driveway Setback; Applicant: <br />Mitch & Alison Ford; location 8378 Groveland Road. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller presented a consideration for a driveway setback variance from Mitch <br />and Alison Ford, 8378 Groveland Road. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller reported the applicants built a new garage in 2003 and the driveway to <br />the garage in the spring of 2004. She stated the driveway was constructed without a permit, <br />however, at that time the City code had been amended to allow a setback of up to one foot with a <br />letter from the neighbor stating their approval, which the Fords did receive. The driveway was <br />installed in the spring of 2004, with no setback from the property line. Planning Associate Heller <br />stated the code was again amended in September 2004 to the current five-foot setback <br />requirement. Planning Associate Heller mentioned Staff received a call concerning the Ford’s <br />driveway and went to the property to investigate. She stated the Fords were instructed to bring <br />the driveway into compliance or apply for a variance. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller mentioned, as with any variance application, for the Planning <br />Commission to act favorably, there must be a demonstrated hardship or practical difficulty <br />associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or <br />restrictive to the property owner. She explained the Code clearly states a hardship exists when <br />all seven criteria are met. Planning Associate Heller stated there are no extraordinary <br />circumstances, which apply to this property. She explained the house is 12 feet from the north <br />property line, which does limit the amount of room to fit a vehicle past the house. She stated by <br />following the one-foot setback, an eleven-foot wide driveway should be wide enough for most <br />vehicles to get by next to the house. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller stated the literal interpretation would not deprive the applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by others in the district. She indicated the applicants are responsible <br />for the condition resulting in the required application for a permit. Planning Associate Heller